• UMG files a motion to dismiss Drake’s lawsuit, calling it “without merit” and claiming it stems from a lost rap battle.
• Drake accuses UMG of promoting Kendrick Lamar’s track “Not Like Us,” which he says spreads harmful misinformation about him.
• The case raises deeper ethical questions about music label practices and the boundaries of artist disputes.

Universal Music Group (UMG) has amped up its defense in a heated legal showdown with Drake, filing a firm motion to dismiss his New York lawsuit. The dispute stems from UMG allegedly promoting Kendrick Lamar’s track “Not Like Us,” which Drake claims unfairly targeted him. According to UMG, Drake is only suing because he “lost a rap battle” and is attempting to “salve his wounds” through legal action—an accusation that’s sparking continued debate in the music world.

UMG's Motion to Dismiss: A Strong Counterattack

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

Earlier today, UMG filed its motion, reviewed by Variety, taking direct aim at Drake’s claims. The label alleged that Drake provoked and willingly participated in the rap rivalry but resorted to legal measures after losing. In bold language, UMG stated, “Instead of accepting the loss like the unbothered rap artist he often portrays, he has sued his own label in a misguided effort to save face.” They argue Drake’s lawsuit is “utterly without merit” and have requested dismissal “with prejudice.”

UMG is also pointing out a double standard in Drake’s arguments. The motion notes that Drake supported a public petition three years ago, criticizing the use of rap lyrics as factual evidence in legal cases. Now, UMG claims, Drake is contradicting that stance by targeting “Not Like Us,” which the label describes as “nonactionable opinion and rhetorical hyperbole.” The legal team insists there’s no malice in promoting the track and says it’s unreasonable for Drake to expect UMG to favor his diss tracks over Lamar’s.

Drake's Lawsuit: A Call for Accountability

Drake, on the other hand, sees the situation differently. He filed the lawsuit in January, accusing UMG of approving and launching a campaign to turn Lamar’s “Not Like Us” into a viral hit. The track, according to Drake, falsely paints him as a “criminal pedophile” and encourages vigilante justice. His legal team argues that UMG profited from spreading dangerous misinformation, which has allegedly led to acts of violence.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

In a statement to Variety, Drake's attorney Michael J. Gottlieb shot back at UMG, calling their motion to dismiss “a desperate ploy.” He claimed the company has a long history of exploiting its artists and vowed that the case would move forward to reveal deeper issues within the label's practices.

What’s Next in This Rap Battle Turned Legal Fight?

While UMG is determined to shut down Drake’s claims, the rapper's lawsuit highlights larger ethical questions about how music labels handle artist disputes and messaging. As the legal drama unfolds, it’s clear this case is far more than a simple rap rivalry—it’s shining a light on the power dynamics in the music industry and how far labels are willing to go in the name of promotion.

Drake also faces an uphill battle. UMG’s motion underlines that his claims lack evidence, particularly regarding his separate Texas petition, where the rapper alleged UMG artificially inflated the reach of “Not Like Us.” The label argues that the accusations don’t hold water under New York privacy and defamation laws, leaving Drake with significant legal hurdles.

Readers, What’s Your Take?

Do you think Drake’s lawsuit is justified, or is this just the fallout of a rap battle gone too far? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and don’t forget to pass this article along to fellow music fans. For more breaking news and analysis in the entertainment world, visit The Dupree Report.