• Federal agencies and unions reject Elon Musk’s demand for weekly federal employee accomplishment reports, citing legality and protocol concerns.
• Leaders like the DoD, FBI, and State Department have instructed employees to pause responses, emphasizing internal procedures.
• Union leaders call Musk’s directive irresponsible, while Musk defends it as a strategy to expose fraud and boost performance.

Federal agencies and unions are rejecting Elon Musk’s controversial push for federal workers to submit weekly accomplishment reports. Last Saturday, Musk tweeted that federal employees must report at least five achievements by Monday midnight or face termination. This demand was followed by an email from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). However, several agencies have urged their employees to hold off, challenging the legality and purpose of the directive.

Agencies Question Musk’s Authority

The Department of Defense (DoD) swiftly responded. Under Secretary of Defense Darin Selnick told employees to pause their responses, stating, “When and if required, the Department will coordinate responses to the email you have received from OPM.” Similarly, FBI Director Kash Patel announced the bureau would conduct internal employee reviews following its own procedures.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

The State Department also chimed in, clarifying that employees are not obligated to report outside their chain of command. Their statement emphasized, “The State Department will respond on behalf of the Department. No employee is obligated to report their activities outside of their Department chain of command.”

In the intelligence sector, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard strongly opposed Musk’s demand, stating, “Given the inherently sensitive and classified nature of our work, I.C. employees should not respond to the OPM email.”

Union Leaders Stand Firm Against Musk

Unions have been quick to defend federal employees. Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), strongly criticized Musk’s directive. Kelley called it an “irresponsible and sophomoric attempt” to cause chaos and intimidate federal workers. He directed the union’s 800,000 members to ignore the email and demanded OPM rescind the request and issue an apology.

Kelley stated, “Federal employees report to their respective agencies through their established chains of command; they do not report to OPM.” His strong opposition reflects growing backlash across federal agencies.

Musk Defends Controversial Email

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Despite the widespread criticism, Musk defended the email, claiming it was designed to weed out fraud and identify high-performing employees. Musk explained that the initiative targets “non-existent people or the identities of dead people” drawing government paychecks. He also backed author Mike Cernovich’s view that this would expose top performers.

What’s Next?

As federal agencies, unions, and leaders push back, Musk’s directive faces mounting challenges. The move has sparked a national conversation about workplace oversight and government accountability.

Do you think this policy holds merit or is it a step too far? Share your thoughts in the comments! Don’t forget to share this article from The Dupree Report to keep the conversation going.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10