- Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil’s deportation has been temporarily halted by a federal judge while a legal petition is reviewed.
- Khalil’s arrest by ICE, despite being a green card holder, has sparked outrage from civil rights groups, citing violations of constitutional rights.
- The case has reignited debates over free speech, national security, and government overreach, with protests and calls for Khalil’s release growing nationwide.
A federal judge has halted the deportation of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, offering a temporary reprieve while reviewing a legal petition challenging his arrest. This decision comes amid growing tensions surrounding free speech, immigration enforcement, and activism in U.S. universities.
Arrest Sparks Outcry from Civil Rights Groups
Khalil, a lawful permanent resident with a green card, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at Columbia University over the weekend. His attorney, Amy Greer, revealed that agents detained him despite clear documentation of his immigration status. This incident has outraged civil rights organizations, with many calling it a violation of constitutional rights.
“ICE detained Mahmoud without proper cause, despite being shown proof of his green card,” Greer stated. Khalil’s wife, who is eight months pregnant, shared that the agents threatened her as well, making the situation even more distressing.
What Happened During Khalil’s Arrest?
Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10
Don't miss out on the news
Get the latest, most crucial news stories on the web – sent straight to your inbox for FREE as soon as they hit! Sign up for Email News Alerts in just 30 seconds!
MORE NEWS: Music Review: Lady Gaga and Bruno Mars: A Soulful Collaboration That Hits All the Right Notes
According to court filings, Khalil was stopped in the lobby of his building, a Columbia-owned property, while returning home with his wife. Agents, who identified themselves as part of the Department of Homeland Security, stated they were arresting him due to a revoked student visa. However, Khalil is a green card holder—not a student visa holder—a fact that appeared to confuse the agents.
Despite presenting his immigration documents, Khalil was taken into custody, leaving his wife uninformed about his whereabouts. For nearly 24 hours, she could not locate him, later learning he was transferred to a facility in Jena, Louisiana.
President Trump Weighs In
President Donald Trump defended ICE’s actions, calling Khalil a “Radical Foreign Pro-Hamas Student” in a post on his Truth Social platform. Trump claimed Khalil’s arrest marked the “first of many to come,” stating, “We will find, apprehend, and deport these terrorist sympathizers from our country—never to return again.”
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT
This rhetoric has further polarized public opinion. Critics argue that such statements undermine freedom of speech, while supporters see it as a move to bolster national security.
Free Speech or National Security?
Khalil’s arrest has reignited debates about the balance between free speech and government enforcement. His lawyers, civil rights groups, and hundreds of protesters argue that his detention is a direct response to his activism against Israel’s actions in Gaza.
Baher Azmy, one of Khalil’s attorneys, dismissed allegations of alignment with Hamas as “false and absurd.” He emphasized that Khalil’s advocacy for Palestinian rights is constitutionally protected speech. “It should be chilling to everyone that the government could punish someone for their political beliefs,” Azmy stated.
On the other hand, some officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, supported Khalil’s arrest. Rubio echoed Trump’s sentiments, tweeting that the U.S. will revoke the visas and green cards of Hamas supporters.
A Movement to Secure Khalil’s Release
Civil rights groups, led by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), have condemned the detention, calling it an attack on the First Amendment. In a public statement, CAIR urged Khalil’s immediate release, describing the arrest as “a blatant assault on free speech.”
Meanwhile, Khalil’s wife made an emotional plea, saying, “I need your help to bring Mahmoud home so he can hold my hand in the delivery room when we welcome our first child.”
Protests Amplify the Call for Justice
The arrest has mobilized activists across the country. In Manhattan, several hundred protesters gathered, holding signs that read, “No political prisoners in the United States” and “Release Mahmoud Khalil.”
One organizer, Marian Osman, stated, “He was arrested for speaking out against genocide. We have a right to free speech in this country.”
These protests follow Trump’s recent threats to cut federal funding for universities allowing “illegal protests.” On Truth Social, he declared, “Agitators will be imprisoned or sent back to their home countries. American students will be expelled or arrested.”
Columbia University’s Response
Columbia University issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to supporting its campus community while complying with legal obligations. “Law enforcement must have a judicial warrant to enter non-public University areas,” the statement read. The university also expressed concern about the presence of ICE agents around campus.
What Happens Next?
For now, Judge Jesse Furman has ordered that Khalil cannot be deported until the court issues a final ruling on his habeas corpus petition. A conference is scheduled for Wednesday morning to discuss the case.
Khalil remains in detention, though his attorney confirmed he is “healthy and undeterred.” This case is far from over, as activists and civil rights groups continue to demand accountability and justice.
What Do You Think?
Do you believe Khalil’s arrest is justified, or does it infringe on his constitutional rights? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and don’t forget to share this article from The Dupree Report with others to keep the conversation going!
Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.