- A Texas judge awarded $6.6 million to four whistleblowers fired after reporting Attorney General Ken Paxton’s alleged misconduct to the FBI, citing violations of the Texas Whistleblower Act.
- The ruling follows allegations that Paxton accepted bribes from real estate developer Nate Paul and retaliated against employees who acted in good faith to report the misconduct.
- Paxton, denying the allegations, called the decision “ridiculous” and plans to appeal while facing ongoing scrutiny and potential political ambitions, including a possible U.S. Senate run.
A Texas district court judge has awarded $6.6 million to four whistleblowers who were fired shortly after they reported allegations against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to the FBI. This ruling marks a significant development in the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Paxton and his actions while in office.
Whistleblowers Fired After Reporting Misconduct
Travis County Judge Catherine Mauzy delivered the judgment on Friday, stating that the plaintiffs had successfully proven liability, damages, and attorneys’ fees against the Attorney General’s Office. The ruling emphasized that Paxton’s office had violated the Texas Whistleblower Act by retaliating against employees who reported alleged violations of law by Paxton and his office. These reports included claims that Paxton had accepted bribes from Austin real estate developer Nate Paul, who also employed a woman with whom Paxton was allegedly having an extramarital affair. Paxton has denied these allegations.
The court upheld that the whistleblowers acted “in good faith” when reporting the misconduct to law enforcement. Notably, Paxton’s office did not contest the claims or damages outlined in the lawsuit.
Attorney General’s Reaction and Legal Challenges
Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10
Don't miss out on the news
Get the latest, most crucial news stories on the web – sent straight to your inbox for FREE as soon as they hit! Sign up for Email News Alerts in just 30 seconds!
In response, Paxton called the ruling “ridiculous” and claimed it was not based on facts or legal precedent. He announced plans to appeal the decision, signaling another phase in the protracted legal battle over his conduct. Paxton, a Republican and close ally of President Donald Trump, has faced multiple allegations of corruption during his tenure, further complicating his political career.
Background on the Case and Whistleblower Protections
Paxton first came under federal investigation in 2020 when eight employees reported his actions to the FBI. They accused him of using his position to benefit Nate Paul. Despite denying wrongdoing, Paxton agreed to a $3.3 million settlement in 2023 with four whistleblowers, offering an apology without admitting guilt. However, when Paxton sought state funds for the settlement, the Texas House rejected his request, launching its own investigation and subsequently impeaching him. The Texas Senate later acquitted him, allowing him to remain in office.
In November, the Texas Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling requiring Paxton to testify in the whistleblower lawsuit. Though the U.S. Justice Department chose not to pursue the investigation into Paxton in the final weeks of the Biden administration, questions about his conduct continue to shadow his career.
Paxton’s Political Ambitions
Despite these controversies, Paxton is preparing for a potential U.S. Senate run. He has hinted at challenging Republican Sen. John Cornyn but has not yet announced his official plans. Paxton remains a controversial yet influential figure within the Republican Party, often aligning himself closely with President Donald Trump.
What This Means for Texas Politics
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT
The court ruling raises critical questions about the protection of whistleblowers and accountability in public office. With $6.6 million awarded to the plaintiffs, this case highlights the consequences of retaliation against employees who expose potential misconduct.
Join the Conversation
What do you think about the ruling and its implications for whistleblower protections? Share your thoughts below. Don’t forget to Follow The Dupree Report on WhatsApp for more updates. Follow The Dupree Report on WhatsApp. For more in-depth analysis, visit The Dupree Report.
Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.