- Judge Jefferson Griffin conceded the race for North Carolina’s State Supreme Court after a federal court rejected his legal challenges, securing Justice Allison Riggs’ eight-year term.
- Riggs’ victory was upheld after two recounts and months of legal disputes, with her campaign spending nearly $100,000 on legal fees to defend the election outcome.
- The ruling reinforces election integrity and sets limits on post-election challenges, marking a significant win for Democrats in a key swing state.
Judge Jefferson Griffin has officially conceded the race for North Carolina’s State Supreme Court, ending a six-month-long legal battle to overturn the 2024 election results. His concession follows a federal court ruling by Judge Richard E. Myers II, a Republican appointee, who rejected Griffin’s legal challenges earlier this week. The court’s decision ensures Justice Allison Riggs, the Democratic candidate, will serve an eight-year term on the court, currently dominated by Republicans.
Federal Court Rejects Griffin’s Legal Challenge
The ruling by Myers II delivered a decisive blow to Griffin’s arguments, emphasizing that “retroactive changes to election procedures” undermine due process and trust in elections. Critics of Griffin’s legal efforts warned they could set a dangerous precedent, allowing election losers to dispute results more broadly. Myers stated, “You establish the rules before the game. You don’t change them after the game is done.”
Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10
Don't miss out on the news
Get the latest, most crucial news stories on the web – sent straight to your inbox for FREE as soon as they hit! Sign up for Email News Alerts in just 30 seconds!
Griffin, in his concession statement, acknowledged the court’s decision but noted his disagreement with the analysis. He announced he would not appeal, effectively closing the chapter on the contentious race.
Riggs Secures Seat After Months of Legal Disputes
Justice Riggs narrowly won the statewide election in November 2024. Her victory was confirmed through two recounts, despite Griffin’s persistent attempts to challenge the results. Riggs’ campaign and supporters spent nearly $100,000 on legal fees to uphold the election outcome, according to campaign finance data.
The Democratic National Committee called Riggs’ victory a win for democracy. DNC Chair Ken Martin criticized Republican efforts to overturn the will of the people, stating, “If you try to undermine voters, you will lose.”
Implications for North Carolina and Beyond
This ruling represents a significant victory for Democrats in a key swing state, bolstering their chances of regaining the majority of the North Carolina Supreme Court in 2028. It also reaffirms judicial precedent on election integrity, setting limits on post-election legal challenges.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT
As the 2024 election cycle officially concludes with this decision, North Carolina remains a battleground for future elections. This case underscores the importance of clear election rules and their consistent application.
What do you think about this outcome? Share your thoughts below and spread the word by sharing this article!
Follow The Dupree Report On WhatsApp and stay informed here.
Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.