• Fox News host Mark Levin’s support for President Trump’s strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities has highlighted divisions within the GOP, with some praising the move as necessary while others voice concerns over long-term consequences. Meanwhile, lawmakers on both sides are demanding clarity on the administration’s legal justification and strategy, setting the stage for debates over war powers.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Fox News host Mark Levin’s vocal support for President Trump’s decision to strike three Iranian nuclear facilities is stirring debate across Capitol Hill. Levin’s praise for the President’s bold action underscores a growing divide within the GOP over U.S. involvement in Iran, with House Republicans weighing how the strikes align with broader national security priorities.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) called the strikes “a necessary step to protect American interests,” while members of the House Freedom Caucus expressed reservations about potential long-term entanglements. “This is about showing strength, not starting a war,” said a senior GOP aide familiar with leadership discussions. However, some Republican lawmakers, including Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), have doubled down on their criticism of military intervention, reflecting tensions within conservative ranks.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

Levin Rallies Support for Trump

Levin, who appeared on Sean Hannity’s show Saturday night, described the mission as “historic” and highlighted Trump’s role as a decisive leader. “There’s no other military on earth that could do this, and no other commander-in-chief with the guts to act,” Levin said. His comments come as hawks within the Republican Party push for a hardline stance on Iran.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Are you glad President Trump is building the new WH ballroom?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from The Dupree Report, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

The strikes have also prompted a flurry of reactions from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, where Chair Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) is seeking clarity on the administration’s legal justification for the strikes. “We need to ensure this action was grounded in congressional authorization,” an aide to Menendez told The Dupree Report.

What’s Next for Congressional Oversight

Lawmakers on both sides are pressing for classified briefings this week to assess the strategic impact of the strikes. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) indicated that Democrats will demand greater transparency on the administration’s long-term strategy for Iran, setting the stage for potential legislative roadblocks.

What to Watch

As Republicans navigate internal divisions and Democrats seek accountability, expect heated debates over war powers in the coming days. Follow The Dupree Report On WhatsApp

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10