• Governor Newsom is suing President Trump over federalizing California’s National Guard, calling it unconstitutional and bypassing state authority.
  • The legal dispute follows protests and unrest in Los Angeles after federal immigration sweeps and clashes with demonstrators.
  • The lawsuit raises questions about state vs. federal powers and could set a significant legal precedent.

(The Dupree Report) – California Governor Gavin Newsom announced plans to sue President Trump over the federalization of the state’s National Guard following protests and unrest in Los Angeles. The lawsuit, set to be filed Monday morning, challenges what Newsom calls an “unconstitutional” action by Trump, claiming it bypasses state authority and protocol. This legal battle highlights tensions between state and federal powers in managing law enforcement and public safety.

Newsom Challenges Trump’s National Guard Deployment

Governor Newsom stated the lawsuit will dispute President Trump’s decision to federalize California’s National Guard without the governor’s consent, a rare action in U.S. history. In an interview with MSNBC, Newsom criticized the move, calling it “illegal, immoral, and unconstitutional.”

“Donald Trump has exacerbated this situation,” Newsom said. “We’re going to challenge this overreach in court to ensure proper protocol is followed.”

The conflict arises after federal agents arrested dozens of individuals in Los Angeles suspected of being in the U.S. illegally. President Trump then activated approximately 2,000 National Guard members to protect federal buildings in the area. Newsom alleges the federal action ignored a key requirement of Trump’s executive order, which stipulates consultation with the state governor.

Timeline of Events: Protests and Federal Actions

On Friday, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents conducted sweeps across Los Angeles, arresting several individuals for alleged immigration violations. Protests erupted shortly after, escalating into violence by Sunday evening. Demonstrators clashed with Guard members and Los Angeles police, leading to blocked roadways, burning vehicles, and damage near a federal detention center.

According to the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), cars were set on fire in a historic neighborhood, prompting authorities to declare an unlawful assembly. California Highway Patrol officers worked to disperse protesters blocking the 101 freeway in downtown Los Angeles.

By Monday morning, the city remained largely calm, but the debate over federal authority continues.

Legal and Constitutional Implications

Newsom argues that Trump’s action violated state sovereignty and constitutional principles. He claims Trump disregarded a required coordination process outlined in the executive order activating the Guard. “There’s a protocol, there’s a process,” Newsom told MSNBC. “He didn’t care about that.”

The White House defended the deployment, with spokeswoman Abigail Jackson stating, “President Trump rightfully stepped in to restore law and order because of Gavin Newsom’s feckless leadership.” Jackson added, “It’s a bald-faced lie for Newsom to claim there was no problem in Los Angeles before President Trump got involved.”

The lawsuit raises questions about the balance of power between state and federal governments, particularly regarding the National Guard’s role in maintaining public order. Legal experts suggest the outcome could set a precedent for future disputes over federalization.

What’s Next?

The lawsuit, expected to be filed Monday, could spark a prolonged legal battle over federal authority and states’ rights. Public and legal scrutiny will likely focus on the constitutional implications and whether proper protocol was followed in the federalization process.

Readers are encouraged to follow this developing story closely as it unfolds in the courts.

Follow The Dupree Report On WhatsApp

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10