• A Democratic-aligned legal group is suing for records on the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
• The lawsuit targets the Justice Department and FBI over withheld communications involving Epstein and President Trump.
• The move follows public frustration over the refusal to release additional case documents.

WASHINGTON, DC (TDR) — The legal advocacy group Democracy Forward has launched a new court battle against the Trump administration, filing a federal lawsuit to obtain records tied to the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The suit targets both the Justice Department and the FBI, seeking internal communications about the case — particularly any correspondence between Epstein and President Trump.

The filing in U.S. District Court in Washington marks what legal observers say may be the first direct FOIA suit of its kind involving the late financier’s case and Trump’s circle. According to Democracy Forward, the group submitted formal Freedom of Information Act requests in late July for materials that have yet to be produced.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

Skye Perryman, the group’s president and CEO, framed the request as a matter of public urgency.

“The court should intervene urgently to ensure the public has access to the information they need about this extraordinary situation,” Perryman said in a statement.

The Justice Department has offered no public comment on the litigation. Federal agencies often resist FOIA releases related to active or historic criminal investigations, citing confidentiality and witness protection rules.

Democracy Forward has a long record of litigation against Trump-era policies, challenging executive actions on education, immigration, and health care. This latest case lands amid renewed public interest in the Epstein file after the DOJ confirmed last month it would withhold further documents despite prior assurances from Attorney General Pam Bondi.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

That decision has sparked frustration among both online researchers and elements of Trump’s political base, fueling speculation about what remains hidden. The administration had sought to unseal grand jury transcripts from earlier Florida proceedings, but U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg ruled they did not meet the legal threshold for public release.

A parallel request in New York is still pending, even as the House Oversight Committee escalates its own probe by subpoenaing DOJ files. Lawmakers hope the documents may illuminate potential connections to Trump and other high-profile figures.

Since Epstein’s 2019 death in federal custody, conspiracy theories have thrived, often focusing on who else might have been implicated and whether authorities engaged in a cover-up. Trump has publicly denied any prior knowledge of Epstein’s crimes and says he severed ties long before the 2019 charges.

Still, bipartisan lawmakers have pressed for more transparency, insisting the public deserves to know the scope of Epstein’s network and whether powerful individuals were shielded from accountability.

The case now heads into the federal docket, where a judge will decide whether the administration must comply with the FOIA request or whether secrecy will prevail yet again. For Democracy Forward, the lawsuit is as much about precedent as it is about disclosure: forcing government agencies to honor public records law when politically sensitive matters are involved.

Will this lawsuit crack open one of America’s most guarded political and criminal mysteries — or will the curtain stay firmly closed?

Follow The Wayne Dupree Show on YouTube

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10