• CNN law enforcement analyst John Miller detailed how the shooter who killed Charlie Kirk carried out a deliberate and premeditated attack.
• The gunman is believed to have fired from an adjacent building roughly 200 yards away from Kirk’s speaking event.
• Miller compared the planning required to the attempted assassination of President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, underscoring growing security risks.

NEW YORK, N.Y. (TDR) — The shocking assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University has drawn new scrutiny from law enforcement experts. On CNN, veteran analyst John Miller laid out a chilling analysis of how the shooter was able to stage a precision attack, emphasizing that the incident was neither impulsive nor opportunistic.

A Shot From 200 Yards

According to investigators, the fatal shot came from a building roughly 200 yards away from where Kirk was addressing students. CNN anchor Brianna Keilar raised the issue of premeditation, noting that securing venues may now require the same precautions as presidential-level events. “It’s something I don’t think we’ve thought about before,” she said, underscoring the challenges of campus security.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

Miller agreed, stressing that such an attack would have required time, planning, and careful execution. “You would have to make your way to campus with a long weapon… make your way into a building where you have already scoped out the venue… and find a window,” he explained.

Planning and Execution

Miller broke down the likely mechanics of the crime. “This happens, I believe, at noontime on the campus,” he said. “You would have to do it in a room where you had access, where presumably no one else had access. As you set up a rifle, which likely would be on a bipod or a tripod rather than handheld.”

He also described an alternative method involving a break-down rifle that could be carried discreetly. “Beyond carrying a long rifle in a case, you could have a rifle that you can break down and assemble on the scene, which could come in something as small as a duffel bag,” he noted.

Echoes of Butler, Pennsylvania

Miller drew a direct comparison to the attempted assassination of President Trump in Butler, where a gunman also exploited elevated vantage points and assembled equipment discreetly before firing on a crowd. In both cases, he argued, the attacks demonstrated “very deliberate and premeditated” tactics, requiring foresight and technical ability.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

“This is not a spontaneous event,” Miller said. “It is not someone who was in the crowd and got upset and pulled out a pistol. This was a very deliberate and premeditated and pre-planned event.”

Security Challenges Going Forward

The analysis highlights a sobering reality: traditional security measures at open events may be inadequate in an era when attackers use sniper-style tactics from long distances. The question now confronting universities, campaigns, and security agencies is how to balance accessibility with protection.

Experts warn that, absent new protocols, public figures may remain vulnerable to attacks that bypass perimeter security. “The idea of securing not just the event site but every building within range,” Keilar observed, “is something that may become unavoidable.”

Does Charlie Kirk’s assassination mark a turning point in how America secures political events—or will security remain reactive in the face of rising threats?

Follow The Wayne Dupree Show on YouTube

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10