- DNC Chair Ken Martin met privately with advocates in late October
- Proposal follows Mamdani’s decisive New York City mayoral primary win
- Implementation would require approval from 450-member DNC body
WASHINGTON, DC (TDR) — Democratic politicians and activists are privately lobbying party leadership to adopt ranked-choice voting for the 2028 presidential primaries, a change supporters argue would strengthen the party following divisive nomination contests in recent cycles.
Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin and other top party officials met with advocates at a late October breakfast gathering in Washington, according to three sources who spoke to Axios. The meeting included Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, Biden campaign pollster Celinda Lake, and representatives from the nonprofit FairVote Action.
Mamdani factor
The push comes after ranked-choice voting drew national attention during New York City’s Democratic mayoral primary, where state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani defeated former Governor Andrew Cuomo by 12 percentage points after the ranked-choice tabulation. Mamdani secured 56% of the vote in three rounds of counting, with approximately 78% of voters choosing to rank multiple candidates on their ballots.
Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10
Don't miss out on the news
Get the latest, most crucial news stories on the web – sent straight to your inbox for FREE as soon as they hit! Sign up for Email News Alerts in just 30 seconds!
The 33-year-old democratic socialist’s campaign demonstrated how the voting method can benefit outsider candidates who build broad coalitions rather than relying on plurality wins in crowded fields.
Proponent arguments
Supporters told DNC officials the system would prevent votes from being discarded when candidates drop out and encourage coalition-building rather than divisive attacks between contenders. Lake argued the method addresses current voter sentiment toward party leadership.
“It gives a better chance to new faces, outsider candidates, people with grassroots movements, people who run positive campaigns, people who have something new to offer. It really meets the moment.”
Raskin, a longtime ranked-choice voting advocate, referenced lingering divisions from previous primaries when making the case for change.
“It favors positive politics rather than negative politics, and that’s a great thing for the Democratic Party primaries. Oftentimes there’s a sense of acrimony and bitterness that can last decades. Think about the race between Hillary and Bernie Sanders.”
Mixed reception
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT
The proposal generated divided reactions within party ranks. One DNC member told Axios they were “totally open to ranked-choice voting,” while another expressed skepticism, stating the party should follow state-level experimentation rather than mandate changes from Washington.
Implementation faces significant procedural hurdles. The DNC would need approval from its rules and bylaws committee, followed by a majority vote from the 450-member body. State parties would also need to consent, and many states would require changes to existing election laws.
Broader landscape
The debate unfolds against a mixed national backdrop for ranked-choice voting. Alaska and Maine use the system for state and federal elections, while cities including San Francisco and Minneapolis have adopted it for local contests. Washington, D.C. voters approved ranked-choice voting in 2024 for implementation beginning in 2026.
However, 17 states have now banned the voting method, with Republican-controlled legislatures passing prohibitions in Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Kentucky in 2024 alone. Voters in Colorado, Nevada, Idaho, and Oregon rejected ranked-choice initiatives during last year’s elections.
Party moderates may approach the proposal cautiously, given that the current system produced their preferred nominees in Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden during the 2016 and 2020 primaries. The DNC declined to comment on the discussions.
Should political parties experiment with alternative voting methods to reduce divisiveness in primary elections?
Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
RANK CHOICE “VOTING” Is NOT CONSTITUTIONAL! BALLOT, in person VOTING, according to the Constitution. This “PROCESS” is more like a BULLYING CAUCUS. Voting in a large GROUP, and the ones with the MOST VOTES, progress, then those whose CANDIDATE, lost, get BULLIED by the ones still Standing, another VOTE: Those who lost, once again, people are BULLIED to vote for their CANDIDATE, another VOTE, REPEAT, until there is only ONE STANDING!
THIS IS NOT how the LEGAL PROCESS WORKS!
THIS DISENFRANCHISES MILLIONS OF VOTERS! THE DOJ and SUPREME COURT SHOULD BE ALL OVER THIS!