• Photo showing Trump, Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell removed Saturday then restored Sunday
  • Deputy AG Todd Blanche insists removal had “nothing to do with President Trump”
  • Lawmakers threaten inherent contempt charges against AG Pam Bondi over incomplete release

WASHINGTON, D.C. (TDR) — The Department of Justice on Sunday confirmed the Epstein photo restored to its Epstein files webpage after widespread outrage over its removal, along with approximately 15 other files that had disappeared following Friday’s initial release.

The photo in question showed a desk with a drawer open containing multiple photographs, including at least two images of Donald Trump—one depicting him alongside his wife Melania, Jeffrey Epstein and convicted accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, and another showing him with women in bathing suits.

Blanche Defends Photo Removal on Meet the Press

NBC News’s Kristen Welker questioned Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Sunday’s Meet the Press about why the photo and other files had been taken down from the DOJ’s Epstein Library website.

“You can see in that photo, there’s photographs of women. And so we learned after releasing that photograph that there were concerns about those women and the fact that we had put that photo up. So we pulled that photo down. It has nothing to do with President Trump.”

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

“The absurdity of us pulling down a photo, a single photo, because President Trump was in it, is laughable,” Blanche said, noting the president has acknowledged socializing with Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s.

Epstein Photo Restored After SDNY Review

Hours after the interview, the Department of Justice posted a statement to social media explaining the photo had been temporarily removed for review.

“The Southern District of New York flagged an image of President Trump for potential further action to protect victims,” the DOJ stated. “Out of an abundance of caution, the Department of Justice temporarily removed the image for further review.”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Do you think the United States should keep striking drug boats before they reach America?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from The Dupree Report, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Following that review, officials determined no evidence existed that any Epstein victims were depicted in the photograph. The image was subsequently reposted without any alteration or redaction.

Lawmakers Threaten Contempt Charges Over Incomplete Release

The photo controversy comes amid broader criticism of the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which President Trump signed on November 19, 2025. The law mandated Attorney General Pam Bondi release all unclassified Epstein-related records within 30 days.

Representatives Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who co-sponsored the transparency legislation, announced Sunday they are drafting inherent contempt charges against Bondi over what they characterize as an incomplete and heavily redacted release.

“The quickest way, and I think most expeditious way, to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi,” Massie said on CBS’s Face the Nation. “And that doesn’t require going through the courts.”

DOJ Defends Rolling Release Strategy

Blanche defended the department’s approach, arguing that releasing documents on a rolling basis while conducting thorough victim-protection reviews complies with the statute’s intent.

“The reason why we are still reviewing documents and still continuing our process is simply to protect victims,” Blanche told NBC.

When asked whether he was concerned about the impeachment and contempt threats from lawmakers, Blanche responded dismissively.

“Not even a little bit. Bring it on. We are doing everything we’re supposed to be doing to comply with this statute.”

Khanna countered that inherent contempt would not require Senate approval, adding that he and Massie are “building a bipartisan coalition” that would “fine Pam Bondi for every day that she’s not releasing these documents.”

Friday’s release included roughly 3,000 photographs and documents, many heavily redacted. One 119-page grand jury transcript was initially released completely blacked out before being re-released Sunday with minimal redactions.

Will the bipartisan push for inherent contempt succeed in forcing the complete release of all Epstein files?

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10