• Justice Department refuses to hand over newly discovered Epstein documents
• Prosecutors claim release could harm “ongoing foreign-intelligence operations”
• Federal judge threatens contempt proceedings if DOJ does not comply by July 19

WASHINGTON, D.C. (TDR) — The U.S. Justice Department told a federal judge Friday it will not obey a June 20 court directive to produce thousands of newly unearthed documents related to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, reigniting accusations of a government cover-up and setting up a rare showdown between the executive branch and the judiciary.

In a 19-page filing before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, senior DOJ lawyers argued that release of the material—said to include encrypted emails, travel manifests and at least 2,400 photographs—would jeopardize “active foreign-intelligence operations,” violate privacy rights of third parties and reveal “sensitive investigative techniques.”

“The government respectfully declines to adhere to the Court’s request,” wrote Assistant Attorney General Matthew Olsen. “National-security equities outweigh the public-interest presumption of access at this time.”

Judge Gives Prosecutors 14-Day Ultimatum

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

Judge Jesse M. Furman, who has overseen the Epstein document litigation since 2022, responded within hours, ordering DOJ to either produce the files or submit a classified affidavit explaining why each category cannot be released by July 19. Failure to do so, he warned, will trigger contempt proceedings and potential sanctions.

“The Department of Justice is not above the law,” Furman said from the bench. “Litigants—especially the government—do not get to pick and choose which court orders they follow.”

What the Files Supposedly Contain

According to a partially redacted inventory submitted by DOJ, the cache includes:

• Encrypted Signal chats between Epstein and unnamed foreign nationals spanning 2015-2019;
• Flight manifests for more than 120 private-jet trips, including coordinates for “black-site” landing strips in the Caribbean;
• 2,400 photographs—some time-stamped 2017-2018—showing guests at Epstein’s Little St. James island and Zorro Ranch;
• Spreadsheets listing cash payments to “models” and “interpreters” with passport numbers from Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan;
• A 2016 memo titled “Diplomatic Immunity Options” bearing State Department letterhead.

Government lawyers insist the material was only discovered in April during a “routine transfer” of evidence from the Southern District of Florida to New York, and that it had been sealed under a 2008 non-prosecution agreement later invalidated by a federal appeals court.

Plaintiffs Cry Cover-Up

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

The underlying lawsuit was brought by more than 40 Epstein accusers seeking full disclosure of co-conspirators and potential enablers. Their lead counsel, David Boies, told reporters Friday the DOJ stance “reeks of the same favoritism that let Epstein skate in 2008.”

“Every time we get close to the names of powerful people, the government invents a new reason to hide the evidence,” Boies said. “National security does not cover up pedophile networks.”

National-Security Hurdle

DOJ’s filing cites two statutes that allow withholding evidence:

• Section 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure—grand-jury secrecy;
• The National Security Act of 1947—protection of intelligence sources and methods.

The government asserts the Epstein files reference “ongoing counter-intelligence operations directed at foreign persons who interacted with the defendant,” and that release could expose “human assets” and “technical collection capabilities.”

“Foreign adversaries are monitoring this litigation,” the brief warns. “Disclosure would provide them a roadmap of U.S. investigative priorities.”

FBI Whistle-Blower Letter Emerges

On Thursday night, Axios published a leaked letter from an unnamed FBI special agent alleging that:

• superiors ordered the Epstein evidence “segregated” from normal case files;
• agents were told to “delay, deflect and deny” Freedom of Information Act requests;
• a senior Justice official met with “State and NSC representatives” in March to discuss “containment strategy.”

The FBI declined to comment on the letter, citing personnel confidentiality.

Judge’s Options

Legal scholars say Judge Furman has several tools:

1. Civil contempt—fines that escalate daily until compliance;
2. Criminal referral—sending DOJ officials to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for prosecution;
3. In-camera review—examining the documents privately and ordering redactions rather than blanket secrecy.

“The judiciary rarely uses the nuclear option of contempt against DOJ, but national-security overreach is the one area where courts push back hard,” said Professor Steve Vladeck of Georgetown Law.

Political Fallout

House Republicans quickly seized on the standoff. Judiciary Committee Chair Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) announced a hearing titled “Transparency vs. Obstruction: DOJ’s Epstein Cover-Up” for July 25, subpoenaing Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify.

Democrats, meanwhile, urged caution. Senate Intelligence Chair Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) said:

“We must balance public accountability with protecting genuine intel sources. I trust the court to find that line.”

Historical Parallels

Scholars compare the clash to the 1971 Pentagon Papers case, where the Nixon administration invoked national security to block publication. The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that the government had not met the “heavy burden” of justifying prior restraint.

“The Epstein files may be sordid, but they are not nuclear launch codes,” said ACLU senior attorney Kate Ruane. “The public has a right to know whether powerful people escaped justice.”

Next 14 Days

DOJ must decide whether to:

• produce the documents with redactions;
• file a classified affidavit explaining why each category is exempt; or
• appeal to the D.C. Circuit, risking a precedent that narrows national-security secrecy.

Judge Furman emphasized Friday that “delay is not a viable strategy.” If DOJ misses the July 19 deadline, he will begin daily fines starting at $10,000 and doubling every week until compliance.

Will the Justice Department finally open the Epstein vault, or will the standoff become the biggest transparency test of the Trump era?

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10