NEED TO KNOW
- Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi told CBS News Friday that “substantial progress” had been made and a “peace deal is within our reach” — hours before the U.S. and Israel launched strikes on Iran
- Iran had agreed to “never, ever” possess nuclear material capable of creating a bomb, with zero stockpiling and full IAEA verification — concessions Albusaidi called “something completely new” that surpassed the 2015 Obama-era deal
- Technical talks were scheduled for Monday in Vienna and Albusaidi planned to meet with U.S. negotiators Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner days later — those meetings will not happen
WASHINGTON, DC (TDR) — Hours before the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes across Iran on Saturday, the diplomat who brokered three rounds of nuclear talks over the past month was on American television describing the closest the two countries had come to a deal — and pleading for more time.
Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi told CBS News’ “Face the Nation” on Friday that negotiators had made “substantial progress” that was “far, far more than any time before” and that “a peace deal is within our reach.”
Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10
Don't miss out on the news
Get the latest, most crucial news stories on the web – sent straight to your inbox for FREE as soon as they hit! Sign up for Email News Alerts in just 30 seconds!
Within 24 hours, that deal was buried under cruise missiles.
WATCH: After meeting with Vice President JD Vance, Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi – a key mediator in the U.S.-Iran nuclear talks – tells @margbrennan “the peace deal is within our reach.” He also said, “I don’t think any alternative to diplomacy is going to solve this… pic.twitter.com/zOuSPxLy5j
— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) February 27, 2026
What Iran Had Agreed To
The specifics Albusaidi outlined on camera were significant — and directly contradicted the justification President Donald Trump offered hours later for launching strikes.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT
According to the Omani foreign minister, Iran had agreed to three conditions during the Geneva negotiations:
Zero nuclear stockpiling. Iran committed to “never, ever have nuclear material that will create a bomb.” Existing enriched uranium would be “blended to the lowest level possible” and converted into fuel that would be “irreversible.”
Full IAEA verification. Iran agreed to grant International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors “full access” to its nuclear sites. Albusaidi said he was “quite confident” American inspectors would also have access.
No bomb-capable material on Iranian soil. Albusaidi called this “something that is not in the old deal” negotiated under President Barack Obama. “This is something completely new. It really makes the enrichment argument less relevant, because now we are talking about zero stockpiling.”
The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action — which Trump called “horrible” and withdrew from during his first term — allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% and maintain limited stockpiles under IAEA monitoring. What Albusaidi described went substantially further.
“I’m asking to continue this process because we have already achieved quite a substantial progress in the direction of a deal. And the heart of this deal is very important, and I think we have captured that heart.” — Badr Albusaidi, Omani Foreign Minister
What Trump Said — On The Same Day
Earlier Friday, Trump told reporters he was “not happy” with the pace of negotiations and had not decided whether to authorize strikes. “I’m not happy with the fact that they’re not willing to give us what we have to have,” he said.
During an event in Texas that afternoon, Trump demanded Iran stop enrichment entirely. “Not 20%, 30%, they always want 20%, 30%, they want it for civilian, you know, for civil,” he said. “I think it’s uncivil.”
Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.