• Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced effective immediate deployment of body cameras to every officer in Minneapolis
• The mandate follows the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens by federal agents in January that triggered widespread protests
• Noem pledged to expand the program nationwide as funding becomes available, reversing Trump cancellation of Biden-era camera requirements

MINNEAPOLIS (TDR) — Every Homeland Security officer operating in Minneapolis will now wear body cameras effective immediately, Secretary Kristi Noem announced Monday, implementing a dramatic policy shift after fatal shootings of American citizens by federal agents sparked national outrage. The mandate covers all Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection personnel deployed to the city as part of the administration’s immigration enforcement surge.

The announcement arrives three weeks after Renee Good was shot and killed by an ICE agent on Jan. 7, and one week after Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse, died in a hail of gunfire from Border Patrol agents on Jan. 24. Both victims were U.S. citizens uninvolved in immigration violations, collateral deaths that have galvanized bipartisan demands for federal law enforcement accountability and stalled congressional funding for the department.

What Does the Body Camera Mandate Require?

Noem issued the order through her official X account Monday afternoon, stating she had consulted with the heads of both ICE and CBP before mandating immediate deployment. The directive requires every officer currently in the field across Minneapolis to wear operational body cameras during all enforcement activities, marking the first time the Trump administration has imposed such a requirement on its immigration enforcement workforce.

“Effective immediately we are deploying body cameras to every officer in the field in Minneapolis. As funding is available, the body camera program will be expanded nationwide. We will rapidly acquire and deploy body cameras to DHS law enforcement across the country.” —Kristi Noem, Homeland Security Secretary, via X, Feb. 2, 2026

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

The mandate represents a significant policy reversal. President Donald Trump rescinded a Joe Biden-era executive order shortly after taking office that would have required all federal law enforcement officers to wear body cameras. That 2022 directive had established the framework for camera deployment across federal agencies, but the Trump administration eliminated it as part of broader deregulation efforts.

Trump nevertheless endorsed the Minneapolis-specific mandate Monday, telling reporters that cameras tend to benefit law enforcement by preventing false narratives.

“They tend to be good for law enforcement because people can’t lie about what’s happening. If she wants to do the camera thing, that’s OK with me.” —President Donald Trump via CNN, Feb. 2, 2026

Why Did Noem Act Now?

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

The secretary’s announcement follows weeks of escalating criticism over the lack of transparency surrounding the two fatal shootings. While bystander video captured portions of both incidents, the absence of consistent body camera footage from federal agents hampered early investigations and fueled accusations that officers were operating without adequate oversight.

DHS officials acknowledged that some agents involved in the Pretti shooting were already wearing body cameras, and that footage from multiple angles exists. However, the department had previously refused to make the recordings public or share them with state investigators, prompting a federal judge to issue a temporary restraining order blocking evidence destruction before lifting it Feb. 2.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Minnesota Democrats had demanded body cameras as a condition for supporting Department of Homeland Security funding, with Schumer summarizing the position as masks off, body cameras on. The Democratic caucus has refused to vote for any funding extension that does not include statutory requirements for officer identification, badge displays, and recording equipment.

“We have said from the beginning that if we are going to fund DHS, we need accountability. Body cameras are a minimum requirement for transparency when federal agents are shooting American citizens in our communities.” —Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., via NBC News, Jan. 28, 2026

How Will This Affect Federal Operations?

The mandate applies to approximately 3,000 federal agents currently deployed in the Minneapolis area as part of the administration’s immigration enforcement surge. The presence of cameras will fundamentally alter how operations are conducted, requiring agents to record all public interactions while creating evidence that could be subject to discovery in both criminal prosecutions and civil litigation.

A federal judge in Chicago previously ordered body cameras for immigration agents during a similar enforcement surge, explicitly telling federal officials the order wasn’t a suggestion and was not up for debate. That judicial precedent, combined with the Minneapolis mandate, suggests cameras may become standard equipment for immigration enforcement regardless of congressional action.

Funding for the devices remains uncertain. A previously negotiated funding bill included $20 million for ICE and CBP to purchase body cameras, but that legislation stalled after the Pretti shooting. The Senate voted late last week to extend DHS funding for only two weeks while negotiations continue, with Democrats insisting that any long-term deal must include camera mandates codified in law rather than administrative policy.

White House border czar Tom Homan, dispatched to Minneapolis after the Pretti shooting, has been working on a drawdown plan for federal forces in the city. However, the timeline for reducing the agent presence remains unclear, and the camera mandate will apply to all officers who remain.

What Are the Broader Implications?

Noem’s commitment to nationwide expansion once funding is available signals a potential sea change in immigration enforcement transparency. Federal law currently does not mandate body cameras for ICE or CBP personnel, leaving such decisions to agency discretion. The Minneapolis mandate, if made permanent and expanded, would create a de facto national requirement without congressional legislation.

Critics argue that cameras alone cannot prevent excessive force, pointing to continued police shootings in jurisdictions with long-standing body camera programs. The Pretti family has accused the administration of spreading sickening lies about their son despite the existence of video evidence, suggesting that recording devices do not guarantee accountability if officials refuse to release footage or discipline officers.

Advocacy groups including the American Civil Liberties Union have cautiously welcomed the mandate while noting that camera policies must include strict guidelines on when devices must be activated, how footage is stored, and who can access recordings. Without such safeguards, they argue, cameras function as tools for surveillance rather than accountability.

The mandate also creates tension with ongoing federal investigations. FBI agents and Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General investigators are currently probing both shootings, and the new camera requirements may generate additional evidence that complicates those inquiries or leads to state criminal charges against agents.

Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey have both called for federal agents to withdraw entirely from the city, arguing that cameras cannot substitute for proper training and community policing. The camera mandate, while addressing one demand, falls short of the full accountability reforms state officials have sought, including an end to roving patrols and requirements for judicial warrants.

Will body cameras provide the transparency needed to restore public trust after two fatal shootings, or will they merely document abuses that continue unchecked in the absence of structural reforms to federal immigration enforcement?

Sources

This report was compiled using information from NBC News coverage of Noem’s announcement, Associated Press reporting on the mandate, CBS News analysis of funding implications, CNN reporting on Trump endorsement, PBS NewsHour coverage of Democratic demands, MinnPost examination of local reactions, Politico reporting on congressional negotiations, The Hill coverage of Schumer statements, and KARE 11 reporting on family responses.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10