• President Trump called Israeli President Isaac Herzog "disgraceful" and said he "should be ashamed of himself" for not pardoning Prime Minister Netanyahu
• The attack marks the sharpest language yet in a months-long pressure campaign that began with Trump's October Knesset speech and a formal letter demanding clemency
• Herzog's office responded that the pardon request remains under legal review and will be decided "without any influence from external or internal pressures of any kind"

WASHINGTON, DC (TDR) — President Donald Trump launched his most aggressive public attack yet on a close ally's head of state Thursday, calling Israeli President Isaac Herzog "disgraceful" and saying he "should be ashamed of himself" for not granting a pardon to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on corruption charges.

"You have a president that refuses to give him a pardon. I think that man should be ashamed of himself. He's disgraceful for not giving it. He should give it."

Trump went further, urging Israeli citizens to pressure their own president into action: "The people of Israel should really shame him." He dismissed the bribery charges at the center of the trial with a wave: "Cigars and champagne — who the hell cares about it?"

The remarks came a day after Trump hosted Netanyahu at the White House for their seventh meeting since Trump returned to office, and represent the most direct attempt by an American president to intervene in another democracy's active criminal proceedings against its own leader.

An Escalating Pressure Campaign

Thursday's attack was not spontaneous. It was the latest step in a deliberate escalation that has played out over nearly a year.

In June 2025, Trump posted on Truth Social that Netanyahu's trial should be "CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Pardon given to a Great Hero," adding that "now it is going to be the United States of America that saves Bibi Netanyahu."

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

In October 2025, Trump went off-script during an address to the Knesset — the Israeli parliament — to directly call on Herzog to grant clemency. "I have an idea: Mr. President, why don't you give him a pardon?" he said from the podium. The improvised aside drew applause and chants of "Bibi" from coalition lawmakers.

In November 2025, Trump sent a formal letter to Herzog, calling the case "a political, unjustified prosecution" and demanding a full pardon. Herzog's office responded that any decision would follow established legal procedures.

In December 2025, during a meeting with Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago, Trump claimed Herzog had told him a pardon was "on its way." Herzog's office immediately denied the claim. On Thursday, Trump repeated the assertion, saying Herzog had "promised" a pardon five times. Israel Hayom reported that Herzog's media office again denied the claims.

Each step has been more confrontational than the last — from suggestion to demand to public insult.

What Netanyahu Is Actually Charged With

The charges Trump dismissed as irrelevant are more substantial than cigars and champagne.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Netanyahu was indicted in November 2019 on one count of bribery and three counts of fraud and breach of trust across three cases. Case 1000 alleges he received more than $200,000 in luxury gifts — including cigars and champagne — from Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan and Australian billionaire James Packer in exchange for political favors.

Case 2000 alleges he negotiated with the publisher of Israel's Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper for favorable coverage in exchange for legislation that would weaken a rival publication. Prosecutors acknowledge the deal was never completed but argue the negotiation itself constitutes fraud and breach of trust.

Case 4000 — the most serious — alleges Netanyahu granted regulatory favors worth hundreds of millions of dollars to telecom giant Bezeq in exchange for favorable coverage on a news website the company controlled. This case carries the bribery charge, which under Israeli law is punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

Netanyahu has denied all charges, calling the prosecution a "witch hunt." His trial began in May 2020 and has been repeatedly delayed by COVID-19, the Gaza war, and what critics describe as deliberate defense tactics.

Herzog's Balancing Act

Herzog's response Thursday was carefully calibrated — respectful of Trump's stature while asserting Israeli sovereignty over its own legal system.

"President Herzog appreciates President Trump for his significant contribution to the State of Israel and its security. Israel is a sovereign state governed by the rule of law."

His office clarified that Netanyahu's pardon request is "currently under review at the Justice Ministry for a legal opinion in accordance with the established procedures" and that upon completion of that process, Herzog would consider it "in accordance with the law, the best interests of the State of Israel, guided by his conscience, and without any influence from external or internal pressures of any kind."

The phrase "without any influence from external or internal pressures" was the diplomatic equivalent of a boundary line drawn in permanent ink.

Herzog's position has been consistent throughout. Under Israeli law, the president has the authority to grant pardons, but the process typically requires a formal request, a Justice Ministry review, and — by established precedent if not strict legal requirement — an admission of guilt and expression of remorse. Netanyahu has refused to admit any wrongdoing.

"Pardon is a word for forgiveness. A pardon without some kind of admission of guilt is very unusual and even illegal. The message will be undermining of rule of law."

That assessment came from Amir Fuchs, a senior researcher at the Israel Democracy Institute, who has noted that pre-conviction pardons are "extremely rare" in Israeli history.

Israeli Opposition Pushes Back

Trump's intervention has drawn sharp criticism from Israeli opposition leaders who frame the issue as a test of national sovereignty.

Opposition leader Yair Lapid has repeatedly argued that there should be no pardon "without an admission of guilt, an expression of remorse, and an immediate withdrawal from political life."

"With all due respect to Trump — he should not interfere in a legal process in an independent country."

Lapid has suggested the pardon push may be "compensation" for other concessions Trump has extracted from Netanyahu on Gaza and Iran.

Former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot offered a pointed observation:

"Anyone confident in the cleanliness of their hands and their innocence does not seek favors from an external party."

Knesset member Gilad Kariv of the Democrats party addressed Trump directly on social media:

"Mr. President, the Jewish tradition teaches us that no person is above the law. Not even a prime minister."

On the other side, National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir called on Herzog to comply with Trump's appeal, and Foreign Minister Gideon Saar defended the pressure:

"So when the President of the United States calls for the trial to be canceled or for a pardon — is there anyone who can say he is wrong?"

The Sovereignty Question

The episode raises a question that extends well beyond Netanyahu's trial. American presidents routinely exert influence over allies' policy decisions — on trade, defense spending, diplomatic alignment. But publicly attacking a foreign head of state by name and urging that nation's citizens to "shame" their president for following their own legal procedures represents a different category of intervention.

Trump's own legal history adds another layer. He was convicted on 34 felony counts in a New York hush-money case in 2024 before winning the presidency. His argument that Netanyahu's charges amount to political persecution mirrors language he has used about his own legal battles. The personal identification between the two leaders — both right-wing populists who have survived scandals that would have ended most political careers — makes it difficult to separate geopolitical leverage from personal loyalty.

Netanyahu, meanwhile, faces legal pressure from multiple directions. In addition to his domestic corruption trial, he is subject to an International Criminal Court arrest warrant issued in November 2024 over alleged war crimes in Gaza, including the use of starvation as a weapon of war. Both Israel and the United States reject the ICC's jurisdiction.

When an American president publicly attacks a close ally's head of state for following that country's own legal procedures, does the pressure strengthen the case for clemency — or does it make granting a pardon politically impossible?

Sources

This report was compiled using information from Axios' reporting on Trump's attack on Herzog, Al Jazeera's coverage of the pardon pressure campaign, The Times of Israel's liveblog on Herzog's response, Israel Hayom's reporting on Trump's claims and Herzog's denial, Axios' coverage of Trump's October Knesset speech, The Times of Israel's report on Trump's November letter to Herzog, The Times of Israel's report on Trump's December pardon claims, NBC News' coverage of Netanyahu's pardon request, Middle East Eye's explainer on the corruption charges, PBS NewsHour's reporting on Israeli opposition reactions, The Jerusalem Post's analysis of the pardon process, and Middle East Eye's review of Israeli press criticism.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10