• Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche told congressional leaders that the DOJ has fulfilled its legal obligation under the Epstein Files Transparency Act by releasing all related documents
• The six-page letter includes a list of roughly 130 "politically exposed persons" named in the files ranging from President Trump and former President Biden to Janis Joplin and Marilyn Monroe
• Bipartisan critics including Rep. Ro Khanna and Rep. Thomas Massie say the list deliberately conflates predators with people who were merely mentioned in passing to muddy accountability

WASHINGTON, DC (TDR) — Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche informed Congress on Saturday night that the Justice Department has released "all" documents related to convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, claiming full compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act — a declaration that drew immediate pushback from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle who say the Epstein files release remains incomplete and deliberately obscured.

The six-page letter, addressed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA), ranking member Dick Durbin (D-IL), House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) and ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-MD), outlined the DOJ's rationale for redactions and included a mandated list of every government official and "politically exposed person" appearing anywhere in the released Epstein documents.

"In accordance with the requirements of the Act, and as described in various Department submissions to the courts of the Southern District of New York assigned to the Epstein and Maxwell prosecutions and related orders, the Department released all 'records, documents, communications and investigative materials in the possession of the Department' that 'relate to' Epstein."

Epstein Files Release Includes Sweeping Names List

The letter's most politically significant element is the list of roughly 130 individuals the DOJ identified as politically exposed persons — or "PEPs" — named anywhere in the released files. The roster spans a remarkable range of public figures including President Donald Trump, former Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama, former President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Kamala Harris, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Tucker Carlson, and others.

The letter itself acknowledged the breadth issue directly:

"Names appear in the files released under the Act in a wide variety of contexts. For example, some individuals had extensive direct email contact with Epstein or Maxwell, while other individuals are mentioned only in a portion of a document, including press reporting, that on its face is unrelated to the Epstein or Maxwell matters."

The DOJ also stated that redactions were limited to victim protection:

"No records were withheld or redacted 'on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.'"

Bipartisan Criticism Erupts Over List Approach

The decision to publish a flat list of names without context — grouping people who had direct contact with Epstein alongside those merely referenced in news clippings found in his possession — drew swift condemnation.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), who co-sponsored the Transparency Act with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), called the approach deliberately misleading:

"The DOJ is once again purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email. To have Janis Joplin, who died when Epstein was 17, in the same list as Larry Nassar, who went to prison for the sexual abuse of hundreds of young women and child pornography, with no clarification of how either was mentioned in the files, is absurd."

Khanna called for full transparency with targeted protections rather than the blanket approach Bondi's DOJ has pursued.

"Release the full files. Stop protecting predators. Redact only the survivors' names."

The inclusion of Janis Joplin and Marilyn Monroe — who died in 1970 and 1962 respectively, well before Epstein's known criminal activities — became an immediate focal point for critics arguing the list was designed to make meaningful analysis of culpability nearly impossible.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) posed pointed questions in a post on X, including whether the DOJ has released "ALL of the co-conspirator memos, the corporate protection memos, the original Palm Beach Police Department reports" and challenged the agency's math:

"Your numbers keep changing. You say you collected 6 million pages but you're only releasing 3 million. What's in the 3 million that are missing?"

Epstein Files Release Follows Explosive Hearing

The Saturday letter arrived just days after a combative House Judiciary Committee hearing on Feb. 11 in which Bondi faced bipartisan fire over the DOJ's handling of the files.

Raskin opened the hearing by accusing Bondi of "ignoring" victims and leading what he called the "biggest failure in Justice Department history." Massie, a Republican, pressed Bondi on why certain names — including L Brands founder Les Wexner — had been redacted from the public release. Bondi responded by calling Massie a "failed politician" and accusing him of "Trump Derangement Syndrome."

Massie had been among the most aggressive Republican voices on the files, telling Bondi during the hearing that the situation was "bigger than Watergate."

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

The hearing also produced a surveillance controversy after photographers captured Bondi holding a document titled "Jayapal Pramila Search History" — a printout of Rep. Pramila Jayapal's (D-WA) searches of the DOJ's Epstein database. The revelation that the department was tracking congressional searches of the unredacted files triggered bipartisan outrage.

"Members of Congress should be able to conduct oversight without the Department of Justice spying on us. It's outrageous and has to stop."

Jayapal said in a post on X. The DOJ acknowledged the tracking, stating it "logs all searches made on its systems to protect against the release of victim information." House Democrats launched a formal investigation into the tracking on Feb. 13.

Lawmakers Found Redactions Beyond Legal Authority

The Saturday letter also comes after a Feb. 9 visit to the DOJ by Massie and Khanna, who were among the first lawmakers to review unredacted versions of the Epstein files at DOJ headquarters.

The bipartisan pair said they found names of at least six men who were redacted despite not being victims — which would exceed the DOJ's legal authority under the Transparency Act.

Massie described the discovery:

"What I saw that bothered me were the names of at least six men that have been redacted that are likely incriminated by their inclusion in these files."

Khanna subsequently read the six names on the House floor on Feb. 10, invoking congressional speech protections against defamation claims. The names included Wexner, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, Salvatore Nuara, Zurab Mikeladze, Leonic Leonov and Nicola Caputo.

Blanche fired back on X, claiming Khanna had "forced the unmasking of completely random people" who "have NOTHING to do with Epstein or Maxwell." Massie pushed back, saying he had warned the DOJ the names might require context before going public.

Raskin, who also viewed the unredacted files, told CNN that Trump's name was redacted in places it should not have been, including an email thread between Epstein's lawyers and Trump's lawyers regarding Epstein's visits to Mar-a-Lago.

The Numbers Gap Raises Questions

One of the sharpest criticisms centers on the gap between the total volume of files the DOJ collected and what it ultimately released. The department identified over 6 million potentially responsive pages but released approximately 3.5 million, claiming full compliance.

House Judiciary Democrats have pressed for explanations:

"Our review is particularly urgent because DOJ itself claims to have identified over 6 million potentially responsive pages, but after releasing only about half of them — including over 200,000 pages that DOJ redacted or withheld — says strangely that it has fully complied with the law."

The DOJ has maintained that the unreleased pages include duplicates, privileged materials and documents unrelated to the Epstein investigation that happened to be swept into broad collection parameters.

Victim Protection Failures Complicate DOJ Claims

The DOJ's assertion that redactions exist solely to protect victims has been undermined by its own track record. After the initial release in late January, the Wall Street Journal found that the files exposed identifying information for at least 43 victims — a failure the department acknowledged required ongoing corrections.

The letter addressed this problem by establishing a remediation process:

"Any victims or victim counsel who believe that a document has been posted to the DOJ Epstein Library with insufficient redaction can contact the appropriate personnel at the Department through the email address [email protected]."

Epstein survivors have been vocal in their criticism throughout the process. A group of survivors issued a joint statement prior to the Feb. 11 hearing calling the release an incomplete effort "riddled with abnormal and extreme redactions with no explanation."

"The Justice Department cannot claim it is finished releasing files until every legally required document is released and every abuser and enabler is fully exposed."

Broader Context: A Year of Epstein File Battles

Saturday's letter represents the latest chapter in a prolonged and contentious release process that has drawn criticism from across the political spectrum.

Trump promised during his 2024 campaign to release the Epstein files if elected. Bondi said in a February 2025 Fox News interview that the files were "sitting on my desk right now to review." The first phase was released on Feb. 27, 2025, with subsequent waves following through January 30, 2026.

Along the way, the process generated its own controversies. In July 2025, Bondi announced that the DOJ found "no incriminating 'client list'" — a reversal from her earlier suggestion that such a list existed. Then-FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino reportedly had a heated confrontation with Bondi over the handling of the files and was later demoted.

Trump himself shifted his tone on the files over time, telling reporters in July 2025 that Epstein was "somebody that nobody cares about" and calling the files "a big hoax." He later said the January 2026 release "absolved" him of wrongdoing and pointed to an FBI document showing he had cooperated with Florida investigators in 2006.

The DOJ has established an "Epstein Library" portal where all publicly released files are available. The January 30 release included over 2,000 videos and 180,000 images alongside the document trove.

What the Letter Does and Does Not Settle

The Bondi-Blanche letter formally asserts that the DOJ's obligations under the Transparency Act are complete. But it settles little in practice.

The "politically exposed persons" list, by including names ranging from people with documented direct contact to those mentioned only in news clippings Epstein happened to possess, provides no framework for distinguishing between involvement and coincidence. Journalist Josh Gerstein of Politico, who first reported on the letter, noted that it contained far less detail than a standard Freedom of Information Act response.

Massie and Khanna have both indicated they will continue pressing for greater transparency. House Democrats launched an investigation into the DOJ's tracking of congressional searches. And the fundamental question of why roughly half the collected pages remain unreleased has not been answered to the satisfaction of either party.

Does the DOJ's Saturday letter close the book on the Epstein files — or has the decision to release a sweeping names list without context raised more questions about accountability than it answered?

Sources

This report was compiled using information from Mediaite's reporting on the Bondi-Blanche letter, Fox News' first-on coverage of the full letter, The Hill's reporting on the names list and Khanna criticism, The Daily Beast's analysis of the list, CNN's coverage of the Massie-Khanna file review, NPR's reporting on the hearing and file controversies, CBS News' live updates on the Epstein file releases, CNBC's reporting on the Jayapal search history incident, TIME's analysis of the redaction inconsistencies, NBC News' live updates on the DOJ release, official DOJ statements from the Justice Department's Epstein press release, the House Oversight Democrats' letter on victim disclosure, and the Wikipedia timeline of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10