• Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris (R-Md.) said Trump’s June 1 deadline carries “no emergency.”
• Senate adjourned for Memorial Day recess Thursday without holding planned votes.
• Speaker Mike Johnson met Trump at the White House Thursday afternoon.

WASHINGTON (TDR) — House Republican leaders are considering delaying a floor vote on Trump’s $70 billion immigration enforcement bill until after Memorial Day, with Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris (R-Md.) openly dismissing the president’s self-imposed June 1 deadline as political pressure rather than substantive timing.

The big picture: The House delay tracks the Senate’s Thursday collapse, where Republican leadership shelved its planned marathon vote series rather than face Democratic amendments on the Anti-Weaponization Fund. Speaker Mike Johnson met Trump at the White House Thursday afternoon to discuss next steps.

• New York Republicans want to attend a Friday Trump event in Rep. Mike Lawler’s swing district.
• Acting AG Todd Blanche met Senate Republicans for nearly two hours trying to save the fund.
• The Senate has not released final bill text.

Why it matters: The Freedom Caucus chair openly contradicting a Trump deadline is a coalition signal that doesn’t usually appear in public. Harris is the institutional voice of House conservatism, not a moderate dissenter.

• Trump’s national approval dropped to 37% in a NYT/Siena poll released Monday.
• Lawler’s NY-17 is one of three House GOP seats Kamala Harris carried in 2024.
• Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), also from a Harris-won district, opposed the fund outright Wednesday.

Driving the news: The Senate adjourned after Blanche failed to convince Sen. Susan Collins or other Republican appropriators. House leaders had been ready to keep members in town Friday for a vote, but the Senate collapse left no Senate bill to vote on.

• Collins said she does “not support the weaponization fund as it has been described.”
• Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) called it a legal “slush fund.”
• A separate $1 billion White House ballroom security provision is being dropped.

What they’re saying:

• Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), House Freedom Caucus Chair — “We can do it when we come back. There’s no emergency about doing it by June 1, except the president had thrown that date out.”
• Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Senate Appropriations Chair — “I do not support the weaponization fund as it has been described.”

Yes, but: The delay does not kill the bill. Reconciliation gives Republicans a filibuster-proof path once both chambers agree on text. The structural question is whether June 1 was ever achievable given the Senate parliamentarian’s Byrd Rule rulings that stripped key provisions from the package.

• The parliamentarian’s pre-existing rulings already complicated the timeline.
• The DOJ fund collision added an unscheduled obstacle to a tight calendar.
• Johnson retains the option to call members back if the Senate produces text.

Between the lines: Two things are happening at once. The president’s flagship immigration bill is being delayed, and the senior conservative voice in the House is publicly saying the delay doesn’t matter because the deadline was arbitrary. Both true. Neither is being volunteered because both undermine the working theory that Trump’s deadlines drive Republican action.

• Harris’s quote is the kind of intra-coalition truth that usually stays private.
• House leaders deciding swing-district campaign events outrank a Trump deadline is itself a signal.

What’s next:

• Johnson’s meeting with Trump shapes the post-recess timeline.
• The Lawler event Friday becomes the first post-collapse messaging test.
• The DOJ Anti-Weaponization Fund remains operational regardless of legislative delays.

If the president’s deadline carries “no emergency” per his own party’s House conservative chair, whose timeline was June 1 actually serving?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from CBS News, CNN, The Hill on Lawler-Trump, CNN on Fitzpatrick, Washington Examiner, The Hill on the reconciliation timeline, AOL/Nexstar on Trump’s NYT/Siena polling, Bloomberg on the Lawler trip, and the DOJ Office of Public Affairs announcement

• Senate Republicans called off votes on a $70 billion immigration enforcement bill rather than face Democratic Anti-Weaponization Fund amendments.
• Susan Collins, the top Senate appropriator, said she does “not support” the fund as described.
• Trump’s June 1 deadline for the immigration bill will almost certainly be missed.

WASHINGTON (TDR) — Senate Republican leadership shelved votes on Trump’s $70 billion immigration enforcement bill Thursday after a closed caucus meeting where almost no member rose to defend the $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund. Senators left for Memorial Day recess without resolution.

The big picture: The fund became radioactive inside the GOP caucus faster than any policy item this year. Republican senators said they were blindsided by the DOJ announcement and balked at Democratic amendments designed to force votes against MAGA payouts.

• “Hardly any members spoke up” to defend the fund per CNN’s account of the closed meeting.
• Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) told CNN she does “not support the weaponization fund as it has been described.”
• Senate Majority Leader John Thune said members had “very legitimate questions.”

Why it matters: Trump demanded the immigration bill on his desk by June 1. That deadline is now almost certainly dead, with the structural cause being a fund his own DOJ announced three days earlier.

• The bill would deliver tens of billions to ICE and Border Patrol per PBS.
• Democrats forced the issue by threatening fund-restriction amendments.
• A $1 billion White House ballroom security provision is also being dropped.

Driving the news: Acting AG Todd Blanche appeared on Capitol Hill Thursday and failed to convince Collins or other Republican appropriators. Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) called the fund a legal “slush fund.” House Judiciary Republicans tabled Rep. Jamie Raskin’s subpoena motion for Blanche, Bessent, and the IRS Commissioner.

• Rep. Kevin Kiley (R/I-Calif.) sided with Democrats on the subpoena vote.
• Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said the immigration bill is “back to square one.”
• Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) said the fund “will need some attention to keep us on track.”

What they’re saying:

• Sen. Susan Collins, Senate Appropriations Chair — “I do not support the weaponization fund as it has been described.”
• Sen. John Thune, Senate Majority Leader — “Our members have very legitimate questions about it. We’ve had conversations about how we might make sure it’s fenced in appropriately.”

Yes, but: Republican leadership did not roll out any coordinated push to actively sink the fund, per Roll Call. The opposition is internal caucus discomfort and procedural avoidance, not formal repeal. Trump retains executive control of commission appointments and the underlying DOJ memo stands.

• The Senate immigration bill’s procedural failure does not invalidate the fund itself.
• Treasury still must transfer the $1.776 billion within 60 days of the DOJ memo.
• Trump endorsed Texas AG Ken Paxton against Sen. John Cornyn this week, adding tension.

Between the lines: Three days after the DOJ announcement, the fund cost Trump his June 1 immigration deadline. That transmission ratio from policy to political damage is rare. The structural truth: a fund built around a discretionary commission, Trump appointees, and a first claimant who is a Trump insider seeking $2.7 million gave Republican senators nothing to defend on the floor.

• Collins faces a tough 2026 reelection in Maine, sharpening her calculus.
• Thune’s leadership is being tested by Trump’s Cornyn primary endorsement the same week.

What’s next:

• Senators return after Memorial Day recess with the fund still operational.
• The Dunn-Hodges federal lawsuit moves toward its first hearing.
• The Caputo $2.7 million claim tests what the commission will pay.

If a fund Trump’s own DOJ created blew up his June 1 immigration deadline in 72 hours, who exactly is the policy serving?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from CNN, PBS NewsHour, Roll Call, CNN on Fitzpatrick, The Hill on Fitzpatrick legislative options, The Hill on the Raskin bill, The Hill on Caputo and Thune, NBC News, and AOL/Independent on the Capitol Police lawsuit

• Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) vowed Wednesday to “kill” the Anti-Weaponization Fund.
• Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) introduced legislation to bar all federal funding for it.
• The first claimant is Michael Caputo, a Trump ally requesting $2.7 million.

WASHINGTON (TDR) — Pennsylvania Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, a former FBI agent, told reporters Wednesday he would “try to kill” the Trump Justice Department’s $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund, adding genuine bipartisan weight to a constitutional challenge already moving in Congress.

The big picture: Fitzpatrick said his office is “considering legislative options” and a formal letter to the attorney general. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), ranking member of House Judiciary, introduced the “No Taxpayer-Funded Settlement Slush Funds Act of 2026” the same day.

• The Raskin bill bars all federal funds from backing the settlement.
• It would block any January 6 rioter from receiving payouts.
• It requires DOJ to disclose settlements over $100,000 and lets Congress recall funds over $250,000.

Why it matters: Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters he was “not a big fan” of the fund. Republican leadership skepticism is now in the public record alongside Fitzpatrick’s open opposition.

• Fitzpatrick represents a purple Pennsylvania district Democrats targeted for 2026.
• Raskin paired the bill with subpoena requests for Blanche, Bessent, and IRS Commissioner Bisignano, with a coalition forming on Capitol Hill.
• Capitol Police officers Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges filed a separate federal lawsuit Wednesday to dissolve the fund.

Driving the news: The first claimant filed Wednesday is Michael Caputo, a longtime Trump ally who served as HHS spokesperson in the first Trump administration, seeking $2.7 million over the Biden-era Crossfire Hurricane investigation.

• Acting AG Todd Blanche testified Tuesday the fund was “unusual but not unprecedented.”
• Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) noted settlements typically follow litigation, not future claims.
• Treasury must move $1.776 billion within 60 days per the DOJ memo.

What they’re saying:

• Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) — “Bad news. We’re gonna try to kill it. We’re considering legislative options. We’re trying to unpack the legal machinations, but he can’t do that.”
• Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) — “Trump is trying to commandeer nearly $1.8 billion in taxpayer funds to bankroll a slush fund for January 6 cop-beaters and aggrieved MAGA foot soldiers.”

Yes, but: The constitutional argument cuts cleanly across party lines. The Constitution vests appropriations authority in Congress, and the fund draws from the federal Judgment Fund without new congressional approval. Republican strategist Ford O’Connell argued the fund will pay people unrelated to January 6, which both sides now accept.

• The DOJ frames the structure as a settlement mechanism, not an appropriation.
• Blanche told the Senate the commission would screen claims, not categorically exclude classes.
• “Unusual but not unprecedented” leaves wide interpretive space.

Between the lines: The coalition cracking is the structural story, not the family-drama framing some outlets are leading with. A former FBI agent in a swing district, the Senate Majority Leader, and the ranking House Judiciary Democrat are publicly skeptical within 72 hours. That’s bipartisan oversight forming around a constitutional question.

• The first claimant being a Trump ally narrows the political defense window.
• The Judgment Fund precedent question would outlast any administration that won the immediate fight.

What’s next:

• The Raskin bill faces a House Republican majority but with at least one named GOP signal.
• The Dunn-Hodges federal complaint moves toward its first hearing on injunctive relief.
• Caputo’s $2.7 million claim becomes the test case for what the commission will pay.

If the first claimant is a Trump ally and the first congressional opposition includes a former FBI agent, what does that say about who this fund was built for?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from The Hill on Fitzpatrick, The Hill on the Raskin bill, The Hill on Caputo and Thune, Newsweek, Mediaite, the DOJ Office of Public Affairs announcement, AOL/Independent reporting on the Capitol Police lawsuit, and The Hill on Blanche’s testimony

• EU Economy Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis says the UK didn’t tell G7 allies before easing Russia sanctions.
• The UK licence allows Russian-origin diesel and jet fuel refined in India and Turkey.
• Bessent extended a US sanctions waiver the same week, leaving the EU isolated on Russia.

BRUSSELS (TDR) — EU Economy Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis publicly criticized the UK Thursday for easing sanctions on Russian-origin jet fuel and diesel without warning G7 allies. The move came 48 hours after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent extended a US waiver on Russian oil at the same Paris meeting.

The big picture: The UK Department for Business and Trade issued General Trade Licence GBSAN0004 on May 19, taking effect the next day. It permits indefinite imports of Russian crude refined in third countries, exempting diesel and jet fuel from a January 2026 ban.

• The licence covers fuels refined in India and Turkey per Al Jazeera.
• UK petrol hit 158.5p per litre, the highest since December 2022.
• The licence has indefinite duration subject to periodic review.

Why it matters: The G7 sanctions coalition that has held since 2022 is now visibly splitting. The US and UK both moved to ease Russia pressure within 48 hours at a G7 meeting where allies expected to strengthen it.

• Bessent announced the US 30-day waiver extension Monday, reversing his earlier position.
• UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves attended the same Paris meeting without flagging the UK move.
• The EU is pushing a broader maritime services ban to replace the existing G7 oil price cap.

Driving the news: Dombrovskis’s Thursday Brussels press conference framed the UK move as a coalition failure timed badly. G7 discussions had centered on Russia profiting from the Iran war’s energy spike, not relaxing pressure.

• Russia is collecting windfall energy profits since the Hormuz closure.
• UK PM Keir Starmer told Parliament the move is “not a question of lifting existing sanctions in any way whatsoever.”
• The UK joined a G7 statement Tuesday pledging “severe costs” on Russia.

What they’re saying:

• Valdis Dombrovskis, EU Economy Commissioner — “From the EU point of view, we do not think that this is the time to ease pressure on Russia. If anything, we need to strengthen that pressure.”
• Scott Bessent, US Treasury Secretary — “This extension will provide additional flexibility, and we will work with these nations to provide specific licenses as needed.”

Yes, but: The UK has substantive justifications the EU framing minimizes. British households are absorbing real fuel-price shocks from the Hormuz disruption. The licence applies only to fuels processed outside Russia. But Reeves herself said seven months ago Russian oil was “off the market.”

• The licence does not permit direct Russian oil imports.
• India has been refining Russian crude and exporting fuels to Europe throughout the war.
• Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper called the October 2025 ban a “huge blow” to Putin.

Between the lines: The Iran war is now structurally forcing the West to relax Russia sanctions, and no major capital wants to say so. The Hormuz closure created a fuel shortage; replacing those barrels means tapping Russian flows. The EU’s “strengthen pressure” framing collides with physical reality.

• The 2022-2025 sanctions architecture assumed Gulf oil would remain accessible.
• France’s finance minister said further sanctions decisions “could certainly arise” at June’s G7 summit.

What’s next:

• The June G7 leaders’ summit France hosts June 15-17 becomes the first test of whether the coalition holds.
• Ukrainian President Zelenskyy opposed the original US waiver as “not the right decision.”
• Russia continues collecting elevated revenue while the West negotiates.

If the Iran war is forcing sanctions relief on Russia, which Western capital is being honest about the trade-off?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from Euronews, Al Jazeera, ITV News, Reuters via Yahoo, MarineLink, Reed Smith Trade Compliance Hub, Baker McKenzie, the UK Foreign Office October 2025 statement, and AP reporting on Zelenskyy’s response

• Colorado Democrats voted 90% to censure Gov. Jared Polis Wednesday night.
• Polis commuted Tina Peters’ nine-year sentence after a Trump pressure campaign.
• A Republican clerks’ association also opposed the clemency on election integrity grounds.

DENVER (TDR) — The Colorado Democratic Party State Central Committee voted 90% to formally censure Gov. Jared Polis Wednesday night after he commuted the nine-year prison sentence of former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, convicted of breaching voting equipment in pursuit of 2020 election fraud claims.

The big picture: Polis is barred from speaking at, attending as featured guest, or representing the state party at official Democratic events. The censure followed an open letter from current officials, lawmakers, and a DNC member calling Peters’ release “an affront to voters and the Constitution.”

• The censure declared Polis’s conduct “detrimental to the interests of the Colorado Democratic Party.”
• Peters becomes eligible for parole June 1, 2026.
• Polis issued the commutation two days after the General Assembly adjourned.

Why it matters: The Colorado County Clerks Association publicly opposed the clemency. Election-integrity advocates on both sides took the same position against a Democratic governor who sided, in effect, with Trump’s pressure campaign.

• Matt Crane, former GOP clerk running the Clerks Association, called Peters’ sentence “not harsh by any reasonable standard.”
• Peters was convicted on seven counts, including three for attempting to influence a public servant.
• Trump issued a symbolic federal pardon in December 2025 that did not apply to state convictions.

Driving the news: The Wednesday vote followed a Monday complaint filed by state officials and DNC organizers, reported by CPR News. Some progressive lawmakers want the General Assembly to reconvene for further accountability measures.

• Democrats hold large majorities in both Colorado chambers.
• David Seligman, a Democratic candidate for attorney general, called censure insufficient.
• Polis floated clemency publicly in March, citing sentencing disparity.

What they’re saying:

• Colorado Democratic Party statement — “At a time when democracy and voting rights are under attack across the nation, weakening accountability for someone convicted of undermining that trust is a mistake.”
• Eric Maruyama, Polis spokesman — “No clemency decision should be granted only on whether it will be popular. The governor is often attacked on clemency decisions but is a deep believer in mercy.”

Yes, but: Polis’s legal rationale has substance the censure language sidesteps. A Colorado appellate court found the state violated Peters’ First Amendment rights at trial, and Polis cited a sentencing disparity with a former state lawmaker convicted of the same offense who received only probation.

• The commutation “shall not in any way affect the underlying criminal conviction,” per the order.
• Polis granted clemency to 44 individuals last Friday; Peters was one of nine commutations.

Between the lines: Two institutional self-protection moves are happening at once, and only one is in the headlines. The censure protects the Colorado Democratic Party brand on election integrity ahead of 2026. The Polis clemency, granted post-session with no political upside, suggests a calculation about the appellate ruling or about closing the Trump pressure file before 2026 accelerates.

• Neither side is volunteering its internal math.
• Trump’s pressure campaign was public and aggressive; Polis denied it influenced him.

What’s next:

• Peters is expected to be released from La Vista Correctional Facility on or near June 1.
• Progressive Democrats may push for a special session investigation.
• The Politico timeline of the clemency decision becomes the baseline for 2026 messaging.

If a clemency cites real legal rationale but lands inside a partisan pressure campaign, how does an election-integrity defense survive without either ignoring the law or rewarding the pressure?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from Colorado Public Radio, Colorado Newsline, CNN, Fox News, Axios Denver, Politico, and AOL/Reuters reporting on the pre-decision context and the Clerks Association statement

• Trump’s DOJ created a $1.776 billion fund for “weaponization victims” through an IRS lawsuit settlement.
• The settlement also “FOREVER BARRED” the IRS from auditing Trump, his family, or businesses.
• Two Capitol Police officers filed Wednesday to dissolve the fund.

WASHINGTON (TDR) — Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told CNN’s Paula Reid that Americans “want their tax dollars spent” on the new $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund his department created Monday through a settlement of President Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS.

The big picture: The fund, announced as Trump dropped his $10 billion suit over the leak of his tax returns, will pay claimants who say they were victims of politically motivated investigations. A five-member commission appointed by Blanche decides who qualifies.

• Treasury must move $1.776 billion into the account within 60 days from the federal Judgment Fund.
• One commissioner will be chosen “in consultation with congressional leadership.”
• The fund can issue formal apologies and monetary relief without prior litigation.

Why it matters: A separate one-page document signed by Blanche permanently blocks future IRS examinations of Trump and affiliated entities. The IRS is “FOREVER BARRED and PRECLUDED” from pursuing matters that “were raised or could have been raised” in the case.

• The carve-out extends to Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, the Trump Organization, and related trusts.
• Trump called the $1.776 billion figure “peanuts.”
• Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) noted settlements typically follow litigation, not precede future claims.

Driving the news: Two Capitol Police officers injured on January 6, former officer Harry Dunn and MPD Officer Daniel Hodges, filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday to dissolve the fund. Their complaint calls it “the most brazen act of presidential corruption this century.”

• Blanche told Reid that violent offenders aren’t categorically excluded; commissioners decide case-by-case.
• The plaintiffs allege the fund will “finance the insurrectionists and paramilitary groups that commit violence in his name.”
• Blanche testified Tuesday the fund is “unusual, but not unprecedented.”

What they’re saying:

• Todd Blanche, Acting Attorney General — “I do not think the American people have issues with that. To the contrary, I think they do want their tax dollars spent on things like that.”
• Sen. Chris Van Hollen, Senate Appropriations ranking member — “Mr. Attorney General, this is an outrageous, unprecedented slush fund that you’ve set up.”

Yes, but: The underlying lawsuit had legal merit. Charles Littlejohn, the IRS contractor who leaked Trump’s returns, was convicted and sentenced. Where the structure breaks is scope: not just compensating Trump, but creating a forward-looking fund for unnamed future claimants while barring future IRS examinations of Trump entities.

• Republican subcommittee Chair Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) joined Democrats in pressing for eligibility limits.
• Blanche refused to commit to excluding violent January 6 defendants or Trump campaign donors.

Between the lines: Two transfers are happening at once, and only one is in the headlines. The $1.776 billion gets the coverage. The permanent IRS audit shield gets buried. The structural question isn’t whether weaponization victims deserve recourse. It’s whether a settlement can both create a discretionary fund controlled by Trump appointees and grant the president lifetime immunity from tax review by his own government.

• The IRS bar covers tax returns filed before the settlement and any future matters “that could be pending.”
• The money flows from the Judgment Fund without new congressional action, limiting appropriations oversight.

What’s next:

• The Dunn-Hodges complaint seeks injunctive relief to block the fund.
• Blanche will appoint the five-member commission, including one consultation pick.
• Senate Appropriations Republicans decide whether to restrict FY2027 DOJ funding.

If a settlement can compensate a real wrong while shielding the plaintiff from future review, where does redress end and self-dealing begin?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from CBS News, NPR, The Washington Post, Time, The Hill, The Daily Beast, AOL/The Independent, and Spectrum News

• Grocery prices rose 2.9% year-over-year in April, the highest rate since August 2023.
• Tomatoes jumped nearly 40%, coffee almost 20%, but eggs fell 39%.
• Energy costs from the Iran war take 3-6 months to reach supermarket shelves.

WASHINGTON (TDR) — Federal data confirms what shoppers already feel: groceries are climbing again. The food-at-home index rose 2.9% year-over-year in April per Bureau of Labor Statistics data, the fastest annual pace in nearly three years.

The big picture: The April Consumer Price Index shows grocery prices accelerating just as the Iran war’s energy shock works through the supply chain. Headline CPI hit 3.8% on the year, with the energy index alone up 17.9%.

• Tomatoes led food inflation at nearly 40% year-over-year, the steepest jump in the BLS food-at-home basket.
• Coffee climbed almost 20%; fresh vegetables rose 11.5%.
• Egg prices, last year’s political flashpoint, fell more than 39%.

Why it matters: Household budgets are absorbing the shock unevenly. Produce-heavy shoppers feel it now; protein-heavy shoppers see relief on eggs and poultry. The averaged number hides who’s hit hardest.

• Food-away-from-home prices rose 3.4%, squeezing both restaurants and customers.
• Strait of Hormuz shipping traffic sits at roughly 5% of pre-war levels, with global oil markets still repricing.
• Real wages turned negative in April, with inflation outpacing wage growth for the first time in three years.

Driving the news: BLS released the April CPI report May 13, showing food-at-home up 0.7% month-over-month with five of six grocery categories rising. The Food Industry Association called the jump “significant” while noting it was “expected given global events.”

• Beef, poultry, fish and eggs combined rose 1.3% on the month.
• Fruits and vegetables rose 1.7%; dairy up 0.8%.
• USDA’s Food Price Outlook forecasts vegetables up 4.8% for 2026.

What they’re saying:

• Ken Foster, Purdue University agricultural economist — “Most of what we’re seeing now in the food price chain probably predates the conflict. We’re cautiously waiting to see what the June numbers and the May numbers might show.”
• Andy Harig, FMI Vice President of Tax, Trade, Sustainability and Policy — “The CPI numbers released today show a significant jump in food-at-home inflation. This was expected given global events, but nonetheless poses new challenges for shoppers.”

Yes, but: The 2.9% headline obscures a divided picture. Egg collapse is masking grain, produce, and beverage inflation in averaged data. Trump campaigned on lowering grocery prices; eggs have crashed, but the basket overall is now climbing fastest since 2023.

• Poultry rose less than 1%; fresh whole chicken prices fell nearly 2%.
• Sugar and sweets are up 8.1% year-over-year per USDA data.
• The egg-driven optics may not survive the next two CPI releases.

Between the lines: The story Washington isn’t telling is that the war Trump started is now arriving on supermarket shelves. Energy shocks take three to six months to flow through production, processing, storage, and transport before hitting retail. April’s 2.9% predates the Hormuz disruption. May and June will be the first to carry it.

• Both parties have reasons to leave this unsaid: Republicans don’t want the war priced into groceries; Democrats can’t celebrate without owning Biden-era food inflation that preceded it.
• The Purdue economists’ framing of a pre-conflict baseline with a conflict-driven future sidesteps the partisan frame entirely.

What’s next:

• May CPI releases June 10, the first reading covering post-Hormuz supply shock effects.
• USDA may revise its 2026 food price forecast upward if energy pass-through accelerates.
• Retailers face decisions on whether to absorb costs or pass them through ahead of summer.

If the war’s energy shock hasn’t hit groceries yet, what’s the basket worth defending — and who pays first when it lands?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from the Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI report, Grocery Dive, USDA Economic Research Service, Food Industry Association, CNN, and Nexstar wire reporting on Purdue University analysis

• Iran’s Supreme Leader has ordered the country’s near-weapons-grade uranium not be sent abroad.
• The 440kg stockpile has been unaccounted for since the June 2025 strikes buried it.
• Trump told Israel any deal must remove the material. Tehran just said no.

TEHRAN (TDR) — Iran’s Supreme Leader has issued a directive that the country’s near-weapons-grade uranium stockpile must remain inside the country, hardening Tehran’s position against the central US demand at peace talks.

The big picture: Two senior Iranian sources told Reuters that Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei’s order reflects a consensus across Iran’s establishment that shipping the material out would invite future strikes. The directive lands as the US and Iran trade draft proposals through Pakistani mediation.

• One source called the export option “deep suspicion” of US intent.
• Iran signaled openness earlier this year to diluting the stockpile under IAEA supervision instead.
• Trump said this week the war is in its “final stages” but warned of resumed strikes.

Why it matters: The dispute over where Iran’s uranium sits is the single largest obstacle blocking a ceasefire becoming a peace deal, with Strait of Hormuz traffic running at roughly 5% of pre-war levels.

• US position: stockpile leaves Iran or enrichment halts for 20 years.
• Iranian position: enrichment is a “national right,” material stays on Iranian soil.
• Strait of Hormuz shipping traffic remains at a fraction of pre-war levels.

Driving the news: Khamenei’s directive was reported Thursday by Reuters citing two senior Iranian officials. The order surfaces as Tehran reviews Washington’s latest draft.

• Iran’s ISNA news agency reported the US draft “narrowed existing gaps to some extent.”
• The IAEA has not accessed the bombed sites or verified the material’s location in over eight months.
• Sources cited “feasible formulas” including dilution under IAEA supervision.

What they’re saying:

• Iranian source — “The Supreme Leader’s directive, and the consensus within the establishment, is that the stockpile of enriched uranium should not leave the country.”
• Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel — Will not consider the war over until uranium is removed, proxy militias end, and ballistic missiles are eliminated.

Yes, but: Removing the material requires first finding it. The 440.9 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium documented by the IAEA before the June 2025 strikes has been buried under rubble at bombed facilities, and inspectors have not been allowed back.

• Iran’s safeguards violations predate the current standoff.
• Trump envoy Steve Witkoff told Fox News Iranian negotiators previously confirmed roughly 460kg at 60% purity.

Between the lines: The directive isn’t just a negotiating posture — it’s an acknowledgment of leverage Tehran would lose by giving it up. The stockpile is the only chip Iran holds that Washington genuinely fears. Shipping it out trades that leverage for promises from an administration that broke the last nuclear deal.

• Khamenei is reportedly sidelined after injuries from earlier strikes; the directive may reflect establishment consensus more than personal authority.
• Both sides have reason to keep the issue unresolved short-term: Tehran preserves deterrent, Trump preserves military option.

What’s next:

• Iran finalizes its response to Washington’s latest draft proposal.
• Trump warned of “nasty” consequences if no deal materializes within days.
• IAEA continues to lack access to verify the disputed stockpile’s location.

Should a peace deal hinge on removing material the inspectors can’t even find?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from Reuters via Kathmandu Post, The Times of Israel, The Jerusalem Post, Xinhua, Investing.com, Euronews, the IAEA Board of Governors Report, and Arms Control Association

• DOJ addendum bars IRS from “forever” pursuing Trump tax claims.
• Spokesperson then says it applies only to existing audits.
• Acting AG signed it; he did not sign the original deal.

WASHINGTON (TDR) — A one-page addendum signed by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche says the federal government is “forever barred” from pursuing IRS claims against President Trump, his family, and the Trump Organization for tax returns filed before May 18, 2026.

The big picture: Hours after the document hit the Justice Department website, a DOJ spokesperson told reporters the language covers existing audits only. Both ABC News and Axios corrected their stories after the walkback.

Why it matters: The addendum followed Monday’s $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund settlement resolving Trump’s $10 billion suit against the IRS. The text bars “any and all claims” tied to returns filed before the effective date, language broader than any audit window.

Driving the news:

• The addendum was not in Monday’s nine-page agreement; it appeared Tuesday as a hyperlink in the Monday release.
• Blanche signed the addendum but did not sign the original settlement, per Politico’s reporting of the document trail.
• Blanche testified before a Senate Appropriations panel Tuesday morning and made no mention of the addendum.
• Judge Kathleen Williams dismissed the underlying case Monday and admonished DOJ for opacity in the settlement process.

What they’re saying:

• Natalie Baldassarre, DOJ spokesperson — “As is customary in settlements, both sides have executed waivers of a variety of claims that were or could have been brought.”
• Rep. Richard Neal, House Ways and Means ranking Democrat — “Trump has turned the federal government into his personal protection racket.”
• Trump Organization statement — the deal “sends a clear by-partisan message that the weaponization of federal agencies for political purposes will not be tolerated.”

Yes, but: Federal law at 26 U.S.C. § 7217 prohibits any executive branch official from requesting that the IRS conduct or terminate an audit of any particular taxpayer. DOJ did not address the statute when asked. The addendum also does not specify which “other agencies or departments” its language reaches, leaving the scope ambiguous on its face.

Between the lines: The gap between the signed text and the spoken interpretation is the story. “Forever barred and precluded from prosecuting or pursuing, any and all claims” is settlement-grade language; “existing audits only” is press-office language. One of them governs if challenged. The addendum’s path makes the narrower reading hard to defend as the parties’ intent: added by hyperlink, signed by a different official, omitted from sworn Senate testimony hours before.

What’s next:

• Senate Finance and House Ways and Means Democrats have signaled oversight requests tied to the § 7217 question.
• Judge Williams retains authority to demand the underlying record given Monday’s admonishment.
• The Trump Organization’s pending state-level tax matters sit outside federal settlement reach.

If a one-page addendum says “forever” and a spokesperson says “one year,” which one is the deal?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from CNN, NPR, ABC News, Axios, NBC News, and MSNBC.

• 10-year Treasury yield hit a one-year high as inflation data ran hot.
• Warsh enters with an AI-productivity framework markets are openly doubting.
• Fed-funds futures now price a rate hike as more likely than a cut.

WASHINGTON, DC (TDR) — Kevin Warsh was confirmed Fed chair last week. The bond market is not waiting until June to grade him.

The big picture: Warsh inherits a central bank he campaigned to overhaul, arguing AI-driven productivity gains make rate cuts safe even with inflation above target. The bond market just ran the math on that framework after two hot inflation prints — and rejected it.

• The 10-year Treasury closed at 4.61% on May 18, the highest in a year.
• Yields are pricing inflation persistence, not the disinflationary regime Warsh has described.

Why it matters: Long yields set mortgage rates, business borrowing costs, and the discount rate on every future earnings stream. Warsh’s first meeting is June 16-17, and traders are already telling him the framework he sold to the Senate may not survive contact with the data.

• April CPI rose 3.8% year over year, the highest reading since 2023.
• Producer prices hit 6%, the peak since December 2022.

Driving the news: Following the April CPI release, fed funds futures completed a hawkish repricing that began with the Iran energy shock and accelerated this month.

• Rate-cut odds through 2027 collapsed to near zero per CME FedWatch.
• Hike probability for 2026 surged to 45%, from 1% a month earlier.
• The fed funds target sits at 3.50%-3.75% after the April FOMC hold.

What they’re saying: The disagreement on Warsh’s central thesis runs through the FOMC itself.

• Kevin Warsh, Fed chair — “Inflation is a choice, and the Fed must take responsibility for it” (April 21 confirmation hearing).
• Michael Barr, Fed governor — “I expect that the AI boom is unlikely to be a reason for lowering policy rates”.
• Mark Zandi, Moody’s Analytics — “At this point, I suspect they just stay on hold”, pending inflation expectations.

Yes, but: The bond move is not a pure verdict on Warsh. Energy is doing most of the work.

• The Iran conflict has kept Hormuz effectively closed, pushing oil and gasoline higher.
• Energy alone drove over 40% of April’s CPI gain, the kind of one-time shock Warsh’s preferred trimmed-mean measure would discount.
• If Hormuz reopens, the case that current inflation is transitory gets stronger, and the bond market’s verdict looks early.

Between the lines: Warsh’s framework asks the Fed to lower rates based on productivity gains that have not yet appeared in the data, while trusting that energy spikes will fade. That is a sequence of bets, not a forecast. The bond market is pricing the risk that any one of them is wrong — and that the credibility cost of being wrong falls on a chair Trump nominated explicitly to cut rates.

• The 54-45 confirmation vote was the closest in modern Fed history.
• Markets are now testing whether Warsh’s independence pledge holds when the data points opposite the political pressure.

What’s next: Three data points will set the tone before Warsh gavels in his first meeting.

• May CPI releases June 10, six days before the FOMC.
• The Philadelphia Fed’s forecasters now project Q2 inflation at 6%, up from 2.7% three months ago.
• Warsh’s June 16-17 statement will be the first read on whether his framework survives the data or bends to it.

If AI productivity is real but inflation is also real, which one does a Fed chair act on first — and what does he tell the country he is willing to be wrong about?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from CNBC, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Chase, Trading Economics, CNN Business, and CME FedWatch.

• PJM serves 67 million people and says its current structure is “not tenable.”
• Capacity prices jumped from $29 to $329 per megawatt-day in two years.
• Independent analysts disagree on how much of the bill shock is AI’s fault.

WASHINGTON, DC (TDR) — The AI boom is not happening inside a chatbot. It is happening inside power plants, and a 13-state grid operator just admitted it cannot keep up.

The big picture: PJM Interconnection, which runs the largest electricity market in North America, released a white paper this month warning it has “years, not decades” to fundamentally restructure. The cause is a data-center load the grid was never designed to carry, arriving faster than new generation can be built.

• PJM CEO David Mills said the current situation “is not tenable”.
• The independent market monitor said PJM has never been this short.

Why it matters: This is already on your electric bill, or about to be.

• DC ratepayers saw Pepco bills rise about $10 per month from the latest capacity auction.
• Western Maryland faces roughly $18 more per month; Ohio about $16.
• The Trump administration estimates a PJM-wide hit averaging 15% versus the pre-AI baseline.

Driving the news: PJM’s capacity auctions, the market that sets reservation prices for power years in advance, have repriced violently.

• The 2025/2026 auction cleared at $269.92/MW-day, up from $28.92 the prior year.
• The 2026/2027 auction hit the FERC cap at $329.17/MW-day.
• The 2027/2028 auction cleared at the cap with a supply shortfall. PJM could not buy enough power even at maximum price.

What they’re saying: The diagnosis splits along clean lines.

• David Mills, PJM CEO — “The current situation is not tenable”, per his stakeholder letter.
• Joe Bowring, Monitoring Analytics — “It’s at a crisis stage right now. PJM has never been this short”.
• Chris Wright, Energy Secretary — Trump’s Ratepayer Protection Pledge means Big Tech “covers the cost” so residential rates do not rise.

Yes, but: The case that AI alone is driving rate shock is weaker than headlines suggest.

• E3, in an independent quantitative review, attributed only about half the price increase to load growth — the rest to plant retirements, market design changes, and reduced fossil accreditation.
• SemiAnalysis notes PJM forward energy prices rose just 12-20% for 2028, suggesting traders are not pricing in the same panic PJM’s capacity construct produces.
• The Trump administration blames PJM market failure and 17 GW of baseload retirements during the Biden years, not data centers alone.

Between the lines: Both stories are true at once, and that is why nothing is solved yet. AI demand is a real load shock arriving on a grid that lost generation faster than it built it. The Ratepayer Protection Pledge, signed by Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, Oracle, and xAI, commits Big Tech to fund its own power. But the bills already on doormats reflect auctions held before that pledge existed, and PJM was not invited to the White House signing. The political win was announced months before the regulatory mechanics catch up.

• Virginia’s new rate class requires data centers to pay 85% of distribution and 60% of generation under 14-year contracts, starting January 2027.
• Until that and similar reforms compound, residential ratepayers are absorbing the gap.

What’s next:

• PJM’s June 2026 auction for the 2028/2029 delivery year is the next pricing signal.
• Big Tech pledges face their first test as utilities renegotiate rate structures state by state.
• Bill increases from the 2026/2027 auction hit accounts starting June 1.

If the AI buildout is national strategy, why does the cost arrive as a local utility bill — and who answers for it on Election Day?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from TechCrunch, Bloomberg, IEEFA, E3, SemiAnalysis, The White House, Canary Media, and American Action Forum

• Trump-backed Ed Gallrein defeated Rep. Thomas Massie roughly 54%–46% in Kentucky’s 4th District primary.
• Total outside spending topped $34 million, breaking every House primary record on file.
• Massie joins Sen. Bill Cassidy on the list of Republican incumbents Trump has helped end this cycle.

COVINGTON, KY (TDR) — Rep. Thomas Massie lost his Republican primary Tuesday to Trump-endorsed challenger Ed Gallrein, ending a seven-term run defined by votes against his own party and a six-month feud with the president.

The big picture: Decision Desk HQ and CNN projected Gallrein the winner shortly after 8 p.m. Eastern. The race became a national proxy fight after Donald Trump called Massie “the worst Republican congressman in history” and recruited Gallrein.

• Bloomberg reported the margin at roughly 54%–46% with 58% counted.
• Ad spending crossed $32.6 million per AdImpact via ABC News, pushing above $34 million in later filings.
• The win caps Trump-backed primary upsets that already claimed Sen. Bill Cassidy.

Why it matters: Trump can still end Republican careers when he commits resources, and Congress loses one of its most consistent dissenting voices.

• Massie was the GOP’s most reliable “no” vote on foreign aid and major spending packages.
• His exit cuts the small bloc opposing the Iran war and pushing the Epstein files release.
• Republican incumbents now have a clearer cost-benefit on crossing the president.

Driving the news: Trump pressed the race personally with a phone rally and four Truth Social posts calling Massie “weak” and “pathetic.” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth traveled to Kentucky Monday in an unusual deployment of a Cabinet official into a House primary.

• MAGA KY Inc., run by Trump adviser Chris LaCivita, spent roughly $5.6 million on anti-Massie ads.
• The Republican Jewish Coalition’s super PAC spent another $4 million backing Gallrein.
• Hegseth’s appearance drew Hatch Act complaints from Democracy Forward.

What they’re saying:

• Donald Trump, President — “The Great People of Kentucky are wise to Massie. He only votes against the Republican Party, making life very easy for the Radical Left.”
• Thomas Massie, Rep. (R-KY) — “Three billionaires from outside of Kentucky have funneled millions of dollars in here. They’re trying to buy this seat.”
• Pete Hegseth, Defense Secretary — “Too much grandstanding. Too few great votes. Years of acting like being difficult is the same thing as being courageous.”

Yes, but: The revenge-tour frame obscures who actually paid for it, and Massie’s counter-narrative has holes.

• Trump-aligned MAGA KY PAC spent $5.6 million, but pro-Israel groups including AIPAC’s UDP and the RJC combined for roughly $6.6 million — the larger share of anti-Massie cash.
• Massie’s own first-quarter donors were 76% out-of-state, with only 401 from inside the 4th District.
• Billionaire Jeff Yass routed $7.5 million to a pro-Massie PAC, making the “outside billionaires” framing apply to his own coalition.

Between the lines: One Kentucky district drew $34 million because two donor coalitions decided the seat mattered more than the people voting for it. One faction wanted a foreign-policy critic removed. Another wanted a libertarian holdout preserved. The “MAGA vs. anti-MAGA” framing flattens what was a fight between Trump’s operation and pro-Israel donors on one side, and libertarian megadonors plus small-dollar nationalists on the other, conducted through a district most of the spenders couldn’t locate on a map.

What’s next:

• Gallrein faces nominal Democratic opposition in November in a district Massie won with 99.6% in 2024.
• Trump’s operation turns to GOP incumbents who opposed the Iran strikes or the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
• Sen. Rand Paul and the libertarian coalition lose their strongest House ally.

Was this a $34 million referendum on Massie’s record, or proof a House seat now belongs to whichever donor faction wants it more?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from Bloomberg, The Hill, ABC News, CNN, Fox News, The Washington Post, Al Jazeera, Military.com, LINK nky, Legis1, and Blaze Media.

President Trump dismissed rising gas prices as “peanuts” Tuesday, even as his economic approval hit a new low of 37 percent. With AAA showing the national average at $4.53 per gallon, voters are feeling the squeeze ahead of the 2026 midterms. “This is peanuts. I appreciate everybody putting up with it for a little while. But I don’t even think about it. What I think about is you can’t let Iran have a nuclear weapon,” Trump told reporters at the White House.

Check out WaynesGold.com — or text WAYNE to 35052 — and make your money work for you in a chaotic time where the headlines say things are good but your bank account says another thing.

TheDupreeReport.com — straight news for the politically homeless. Read the story. Check the source. Decide for yourself.

Substack: https://substack.com/@thedupreereport

Twitter/X: https://x.com/realwaynedupree

Facebook: https://facebook.com/realwaynedupree

Instagram: https://instagram.com/realwaynedupree

▶️ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@WayneDupreeShow

• Trump endorsed Ken Paxton over Sen. John Cornyn one week before the May 26 Texas runoff.
• Senate GOP leadership pushed Cornyn; Murkowski went public against the move.
• Paxton polls in a dead heat with Democrat James Talarico; Cornyn led by 1 point.

WASHINGTON (TDR) — President Donald Trump on Tuesday endorsed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over four-term Sen. John Cornyn, overriding months of pleading from Senate Republican leadership in a state Democrats haven’t won statewide since 1994.

The big picture: The endorsement landed during early voting, one week before the May 26 runoff, and over the explicit objections of Senate Majority Leader John Thune and his political operation.

• Thune and Senate GOP allies spent tens of millions on advertising backing Cornyn.
• Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said on the record: “How does that help strengthen the president’s hand when we lose a state like Texas?”
• A Cornyn-allied memo flagged 9 U.S. House districts and 25 Texas state House seats at risk if Paxton tops the November ticket.

Why it matters: Cornyn outpolls Paxton against Democratic nominee James Talarico, and the math is tighter than Republicans have seen in a Texas Senate race in a generation.

• A Texas Southern University poll released Monday showed Cornyn-Talarico at 45-44 and Paxton-Talarico tied 45-45.
• An earlier Texas Politics Project survey had Talarico ahead of Cornyn by 7 points and Paxton by 8 among registered voters.
• Cook Political Report still rates the seat “likely Republican,” but Democrats have outraised both Republicans on the runoff ballot.

Driving the news: Paxton arrived at the endorsement with extensive baggage Cornyn’s campaign spent the runoff highlighting.

• Paxton was impeached by the Texas House on 20 articles in 2023, acquitted on 16 by the state Senate, and faced a 2015 securities fraud indictment he settled in 2024.
• Eight senior aides reported him to the FBI in 2020 over alleged bribery; whistleblowers later won $6.6 million in retaliation claims.
• His wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton, filed for divorce on “biblical grounds.”

What they’re saying:

• Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska — “How does that help strengthen the president’s hand when we lose a state like Texas?”
• Steve Bannon, Paxton ally — “This is as much a vote of no confidence in John Thune as it is a vote of confidence in Ken Paxton.”

Yes, but: Paxton has consistently led recent runoff polling among Republican primary voters, and Trump’s primary endorsement record this cycle has been formidable.

• All but five Trump-endorsed candidates won outright or faced no challenger in March’s Texas, North Carolina, and Arkansas primaries.
• A University of Houston poll had Paxton up 3 points before Trump weighed in.
• Senate Republicans projecting general-election anxiety may be reading suburban concerns the GOP runoff electorate doesn’t share.

Between the lines: The endorsement reveals what Trump’s coalition can no longer reconcile. Senate Republicans need general-election math to hold a majority. Trump needs primary loyalty to maintain leverage over Senate Republicans. Those two imperatives now point at different candidates in the same race, and the Thune-Trump friction over the Anti-Weaponization Fund and the White House ballroom money made the conflict personal. The party that produced the endorsement is not the party that has to defend the seat in November.

What’s next:

• Texas runoff voting ends Friday; Election Day is Tuesday, May 26.
• Wesley Hunt, the third-place March finisher, endorsed Paxton hours after Trump did.
• Democratic outside spending on Talarico is expected to spike if Paxton wins the runoff.

If the party that nominated a candidate doesn’t think he can win the general, who’s responsible when the seat flips, the voters who picked him or the leader who endorsed him?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from NBC News, CNN, Axios, NPR, TIME, The Texas Tribune, Texas Public Radio, PBS NewsHour, KHOU, and the Deseret News

• Russian oil exports to China grew 35% in Q1 2026, per Kremlin readout.
• Putin pressing Xi to finalize Power of Siberia 2 pricing after September’s binding memorandum.
• China still buying Russian crude at discounts created by Western sanctions.

BEIJING (TDR) — Russian President Vladimir Putin arrived in Beijing Tuesday for a state visit with Xi Jinping, making the energy relationship between two sanctioned suppliers and the world’s largest buyer the centerpiece of two days of talks.

The big picture: Russia comes to Beijing needing China more than China needs Russia. The trip lands five days after Trump’s Beijing summit produced a 200-Boeing-jet order and little else.

• Russia’s oil exports to China rose 35% year-over-year in Q1 2026, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said.
• China is now Russia’s top trading partner and leading buyer of Russian crude and gas.
• Beijing buys at sanction-driven discounts while maintaining alternative suppliers in Turkmenistan and Central Asia.

Why it matters: The Power of Siberia 2 pipeline, mooted for two decades, was finally signed as a legally binding memorandum in September 2025. The commercial details that matter to both governments still aren’t settled.

• The 2,600-kilometer pipeline would carry 50 billion cubic meters of gas annually from Russia’s Yamal Peninsula through Mongolia to China.
• Pricing, financing, and the start date remain unresolved. China wants Russian domestic rates near $120 per thousand cubic meters; Russia wants European-style indexing near $265.
• If completed, the pipeline could supply more than one-fifth of China’s projected 2030 gas demand.

Driving the news: Putin is using Iran-driven energy instability to push Beijing toward finalizing terms it has resisted for years.

• The Strait of Hormuz disruption has increased Chinese exposure to Middle East supply shocks.
• Kremlin aide Ushakov told Bloomberg the pipeline is “on the agenda” for “serious” discussion.
• Putin and Xi are expected to issue a joint declaration on a “multipolar world” Wednesday.

What they’re saying:

• Vladimir Putin, in his pre-trip video address — “Russia-China relations have reached a truly unprecedented level.”
• Wang Zichen, Center for China & Globalization — “The Trump visit was about stabilizing the world’s most important bilateral relationship; the Putin visit is about reassuring a long-standing strategic partner.”

Yes, but: China is the buyer that can wait. Chinese gas demand growth has slowed, and Beijing has steadily diversified through Central Asian pipelines and LNG imports from the US, Qatar, and Australia.

• Beijing’s negotiating position has only strengthened as Russia lost European customers after 2022.
• The Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia notes Russia needs the pipeline for strategic export reasons, not profitability.
• Even completed, the pipeline would deliver Russia roughly $2.5 to $4.3 billion in annual rent, a fraction of the $20 billion Moscow earned from European gas before the war.

Between the lines: Both Western sanctions and US foreign policy converged on the same outcome: China sitting in the buyer’s seat for Russian energy with no real competition. Sanctions removed Russia’s leverage to demand European-equivalent prices. Trump’s tariff posture and the Iran war reduced China’s confidence in seaborne LNG. Beijing now negotiates from a position no rival can match, with no urgency to close.

What’s next:

• Putin and Xi are expected to issue formal joint statements Wednesday, with energy cooperation as the centerpiece.
• Whether the joint communique includes a Power of Siberia 2 pricing announcement is the practical test of who blinked.
• Trump faces a separate decision on whether to lift sanctions on Chinese “teapot refineries” processing Iranian crude.

If sanctions were meant to isolate Russia, and tariffs were meant to pressure China, what should Washington have expected when the two countries built the largest energy partnership in the world together?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from CNN, NBC News, NPR, Al Jazeera, CNBC, CSIS, Columbia’s Center on Global Energy Policy, The Moscow Times, and Graphic News

• Acting AG signed one-page document Tuesday barring IRS from pursuing pending tax matters against Trump.
• Provision covers president, his sons, and the Trump Organization — all pending claims included.
• NYU Tax Law Center says DOJ lacks authority to negotiate IRS audit terms in this case.

WASHINGTON (TDR) — The Justice Department on Tuesday expanded its settlement with President Donald Trump to bar the Internal Revenue Service from pursuing any pending tax claims against the president, his family, or his businesses. The move was quietly executed in a one-page document posted to the department’s website.

The big picture: The Tuesday addendum, signed by acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, goes beyond what was announced Monday. It commits the government not to pursue any matters currently pending, including those involving Trump’s tax returns.

• The document is posted publicly on justice.gov but received no formal press rollout.
• Monday’s announcement centered on a $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” replacing direct damages.
• The tax-claim bar covers Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization.

Why it matters: Tax law specialists flagged this specific provision a week before it was signed as potentially outside DOJ’s legal authority and exposing White House officials to criminal liability under the tax code.

• The NYU Tax Law Center wrote that DOJ’s settlement authority extends only to matters referred for prosecution or defense.
• Resolving tax liabilities outside the original complaint would require separate IRS agreements with authorized officials signing.
• Section 7217 of the tax code makes it a crime, carrying up to five years in prison, for White House officials to directly or indirectly request termination of any IRS audit.

Driving the news: Federal Judge Kathleen Williams dismissed the underlying case Monday and admonished the agencies for transparency failures during the settlement process.

• Trump’s original $10 billion lawsuit stemmed from contractor Charles Littlejohn leaking his returns to ProPublica and The New York Times.
• Littlejohn pleaded guilty and was sentenced to five years in 2024.
• The plaintiffs receive a formal apology and no direct payment, with the fund running through December 2028.

What they’re saying:

• Acting AG Todd Blanche — “The machinery of government should never be weaponized against any American.”
• Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore. — “If he follows through, it will be the most brazen theft and abuse of taxpayer dollars by any president in American history.”

Yes, but: Blanche defended the structure by pointing to the Obama-era Pigford settlement, which compensated Native American farmers who alleged USDA discrimination. The comparison is structural — a fund administering claims after a finding of government misconduct.

• Pigford was authorized by Congress and reviewed by an independent monitor.
• The Anti-Weaponization Fund’s five-member commission will be appointed entirely by Blanche.
• Trump retains removal power over commission members.

Between the lines: The Tuesday addendum reveals something about the order of operations. Monday’s announcement framed the deal as ending a private lawsuit. Tuesday’s quieter filing pulls a separate lever, IRS enforcement, that the department’s settlement authority arguably doesn’t reach. Whether the document survives legal challenge or quietly takes effect may depend on which actors inside Treasury and IRS sign the closing agreements the Tax Law Center says are required.

What’s next:

• Democratic lawmakers and ethics groups are expected to challenge the tax-claim provision separately from the fund itself.
• IRS officials face a legal obligation to report any prohibited audit-termination requests to the Treasury Inspector General.
• Applications for the Anti-Weaponization Fund have not opened; Blanche has not announced a timeline.

Should a sitting president be able to settle a lawsuit he filed against his own government — and where does the line sit between resolving litigation and granting himself enforcement immunity?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from The Washington Post, CBS News, TIME, The Globe and Mail, the News Tribune, the NYU Tax Law Center, and the Justice Department’s posted document

• Indiana logged 1 foreclosure filing per 739 housing units in Q1 2026, worst in nation.
• Top three foreclosure states all voted Trump in 2024.
• National foreclosure filings up 26% year-over-year, well below 2008 levels.

INDIANAPOLIS, IN (TDR) — Indiana, South Carolina, and Florida posted the nation’s worst foreclosure rates in the first quarter of 2026, according to property data firm ATTOM. All three states delivered their electoral votes to Donald Trump in 2024.

The big picture: Foreclosure filings are climbing across the country, but the pressure is concentrated in states that built their political identity on lower costs and economic stewardship.

• Nationwide, one in every 1,211 housing units had a foreclosure filing in Q1 2026.
• Indiana hit one in every 739, nearly two-thirds higher than the national rate per Fox News.
• South Carolina (1 in 743) and Florida (1 in 750) followed close behind, according to HousingWire.

Why it matters: Affordability is the dominant 2026 midterm issue. The data shows the squeeze landing hardest on voters Republicans need to hold.

• A total of 118,727 properties had foreclosure filings in Q1, up 26% year-over-year.
• Bank repossessions climbed 45% annually, with lenders taking back 14,020 properties.
• Indianapolis ranked 12th worst among major U.S. metros, alongside Cleveland and Jacksonville.
• South Dakota, Vermont, and Montana posted the lowest foreclosure rates nationally, all states with smaller pandemic-era price spikes.

Driving the news: ATTOM CEO Rob Barber said the rise in starts and bank repossessions signals “financial pressure may be building for some homeowners.” Local Indiana housing advocates point to a specific squeeze: property tax assessments catching up to pandemic-era home values while homeowners insurance rates surge.

What they’re saying:

• Amy Nelson, Fair Housing Center of Central Indiana — “Your mortgage might not be going up, but your home insurance and your property taxes are.”
• Rob Barber, ATTOM CEO — “While volumes remain below historical peaks, the continued rise, especially in starts and bank repossessions, suggests financial pressure may be building for some homeowners.”
• Donna Schmidt, DLS Servicing — “The industry saw five years of very low foreclosure rates due to loss-mitigation policies that allowed borrowers to kick the can down the road.”

Yes, but: The political geography frame has real limits. By April, Delaware overtook Indiana for the nation’s worst monthly foreclosure rate, and Illinois sits in the top five. Total foreclosure activity remains well below 2008 crisis levels. Indiana saw 14,000 filings per quarter at the subprime collapse versus roughly 4,000 in Q1, per the WBIW recap of ATTOM’s metro data. The structural drivers (property taxes, insurance, post-pandemic price reversion) don’t track cleanly to any single party’s policy choices.

Between the lines: Both parties have an interest in misreading this data. Democrats want a Trump-economy narrative the timing doesn’t support; the foreclosure pipeline reflects loans originated and stressed under the prior administration. Republicans want to wave it off as normalization, but the concentration in their voter base is a political problem regardless of cause. The honest reading is harder for both sides: the affordability crisis is structural, bipartisan, and accelerating in places where homeowners were told the cost of living would be lower.

What’s next:

• Indiana’s Senate Enrolled Act 1, signed by Gov. Mike Braun in April 2025, phases in homeowner relief beginning with 2026 tax bills.
• Florida insurance market reform remains stalled as carriers continue exiting the state.
• ATTOM’s next monthly report drops in mid-June, with eyes on whether Delaware or Indiana leads the quarterly count again.

Is the affordability crisis a failure of the party in power now, the party in power when these loans were written, or a structural problem neither side wants to name?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting and data from ATTOM, Fox News, HousingWire, Yahoo Finance, Newsweek, WBIW, SoFi, PR Newswire, Inside Indiana Business, and Purdue Extension

• Heritage’s election fraud database lists roughly 1,500 proven cases since 1982.
• Just 68 involve noncitizen voting — and only 10 are undocumented immigrants.
• Project 2025 architects use this data to push citizenship-verification mandates.

WASHINGTON (TDR) — The Heritage Foundation’s own election fraud database documents 10 undocumented immigrants voting in American elections over roughly four decades. The same resource is cited by Project 2025 architects pushing federal citizenship-verification mandates.

The big picture: The think tank that authored Project 2025 has spent years collecting proven instances of election fraud to argue for stricter voting laws. Independent reviews of that same database produce the opposite conclusion.

• The Brennan Center found the database contained just 41 cases of noncitizen voting across five decades when first reviewed in 2017.
• A more recent American Immigration Council analysis tallied 68 total noncitizen cases, with only 10 involving undocumented immigrants.
• Heritage itself describes the database as “a sampling,” not an exhaustive count.

Why it matters: Citizenship-verification mandates are reshaping state voter rolls and federal policy. The factual basis for those changes is increasingly thin.

• Newsweek reported the database now totals 1,561 instances against more than a billion votes cast since 1982.
• Brookings calculated Pennsylvania logged 39 fraud cases against over 100 million votes across 30 years.
• A 2017 Brennan analysis found suspected noncitizen voting referrals across 42 jurisdictions hit 0.0001% of ballots cast.

Driving the news: Hans von Spakovsky, a Heritage senior legal fellow and Project 2025 contributor, has outlined how DHS and DOJ should pursue aggressive citizenship verification under the second Trump administration. The Brennan Center reports DOJ has already created a special unit to investigate alleged election crimes. Texas Republicans cited the same Heritage data to justify SB 1113, which lets the state withhold funds from counties that fail to purge noncitizens from voter rolls.

What they’re saying:

• Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, American Immigration Council — “The lessons to take from Heritage’s own database are that noncitizen voting is not a serious problem and that to the extent rare cases occur, they would be best addressed by better training government workers.”
• Darrell West, Brookings Institution — “It’s a criminal offense to commit ballot fraud, and most people don’t want to go to jail. So that’s a sufficient deterrent for almost everybody.”
• The Heritage Foundation — The database is “intended to demonstrate the vulnerabilities in the election system and the many ways in which fraud is committed.”

Yes, but: Heritage is correct the database is not exhaustive. Undetected fraud cannot be counted, and prosecution rates depend on state enforcement priorities. Critics citing the database against Heritage’s own framing are using a promotional sampling, not a scientific audit. The honest read cuts both ways: nobody has produced evidence of significant noncitizen voting, including the institution most motivated to find it.

Between the lines: A think tank doesn’t spend eight years building a public database, promote it as proof of systemic vulnerability, then disclaim it as anecdotal when totals don’t support the alarm. Heritage built the resource to argue a case. The case it actually proves is that existing legal architecture (federal prohibition, state prosecution, identity verification) already catches what it’s designed to catch. Project 2025’s citizenship-verification push isn’t downstream of the data. The data is downstream of the political project.

What’s next:

• Federal lawsuits over DHS citizenship-data sharing with states are working through courts.
• State legislatures continue advancing proof-of-citizenship registration laws, including Texas SB 1113.
• The 2026 midterms will be the first national test of the verification regime built on this data.

If 10 proven cases in 40 years justifies a federal verification regime, what evidence would ever justify rolling one back?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from the American Immigration Council, the Brennan Center for Justice, Brookings, Newsweek, Democracy Docket, KERA News, and The Heritage Foundation.

• Treasury General Counsel Brian Morrissey resigned Monday, seven months after Senate confirmation.
• DOJ announced a $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” tied to Trump’s withdrawn $10 billion IRS lawsuit.
• 93 House Democrats filed an amicus brief; judge closed the case without scrutiny.

RANDALLSTOWN, MD (TDR) — The Treasury Department’s top lawyer resigned Monday hours after the Justice Department announced a $1.776 billion fund to compensate people who claim they were politically targeted, drawn from a settlement of President Trump’s own lawsuit against the federal government.

The big picture: Brian Morrissey, confirmed in October 2025, stepped down the same day acting AG Todd Blanche unveiled the “Anti-Weaponization Fund.” The money will come from the federal Judgment Fund, a permanent Treasury appropriation that requires no congressional vote.

• Morrissey is a former Sidley Austin partner and clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas
• He thanked Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in his resignation letter
• Treasury said he “served with both honor and integrity”

Why it matters: A sitting president has never before sought and received a monetary settlement from the government he leads, House Democrats argued in a filing in the Southern District of Florida.

• Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization receive a formal apology, but no direct payment
• Trump also dropped two civil claims totaling $230 million tied to the Russia probe and the Mar-a-Lago search
• Judge Kathleen Williams closed the case, saying she was “stripped of jurisdiction”

Driving the news: Blanche, Trump’s former personal defense attorney, will appoint four of five commission members, with one selected in consultation with congressional leadership. Trump can remove any member without cause.

• Claims processing ends Dec. 15, 2028; unused funds revert to government
• DOJ cited the Obama-era Keepseagle v. Vilsack $760 million Native American farmer settlement as precedent
• DOJ said there will be “no partisan requirements” for eligibility

What they’re saying:

• Todd Blanche, acting Attorney General — “The machinery of government should never be weaponized against any American.”
• Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., House Judiciary ranking member — “No president can concoct a fake case for $10 billion in damages against the government so he can be plaintiff and defendant and then ‘settle’ his bogus case against himself.”
• Retired Judge William Smith, George W. Bush appointee — “It’s a fairly thinly veiled attempt to funnel federal money to people that are sympathetic to the president’s cause.”

Yes, but: The Keepseagle precedent DOJ cited differs in two key ways. That settlement compensated farmers in a class action against the USDA, with eligibility determined through litigation. This fund creates a commission appointed almost entirely by an attorney general who was the plaintiff’s personal lawyer.

• Federal settlement authority requires “actual or imminent litigation”, which Democrats argue a voluntarily dismissed suit is not
• DOJ insists eligibility criteria will be non-partisan, but criteria have not been released
• The two-year statute of limitations on the underlying civil claims had arguably already run

Between the lines: Morrissey’s silence is the story. A sitting general counsel does not usually quit seven months in without a public reason. That he thanked Trump and Bessent in writing while declining all comment indicates a legal calculation, not a political one. Whatever he saw was serious enough to leave, and serious enough not to say so.

What’s next:

• House Democrats’ amicus brief is now moot; further litigation needs new plaintiffs with standing
• Treasury has not named an acting general counsel
• Commission appointments and eligibility criteria expected in coming weeks

When the Department of Justice serves as both the plaintiff’s friend and the defendant’s gatekeeper, what is left of the adversarial process, and who is accountable when there isn’t one?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from The New York Times, The Hill, TIME, NBC News, ABC News, CNN, Politico, and Reuters

KY-4’s Massie race is now the most expensive House primary in U.S. history — $32M+ in ad spending, $25.8M from super PACs. The machine: Trump’s political operation recruited Navy SEAL Ed Gallrein, Hegseth campaigned in-person, and MAGA KY PAC (funded by Paul Singer and Miriam Adelson) dumped millions, including AI deepfakes. AIPAC-linked United Democracy Project drove nearly half of anti-Massie spending — retribution for his Epstein push, Iran war opposition, and Israel-aid skepticism.

Check out WaynesGold.com — or text WAYNE to 35052 — and make your money work for you in a chaotic time where the headlines say things are good but your bank account says another thing.

TheDupreeReport.com — straight news for the politically homeless. Read the story. Check the source. Decide for yourself.

Substack: https://substack.com/@thedupreereport

Twitter/X: https://x.com/realwaynedupree

Facebook: https://facebook.com/realwaynedupree

Instagram: https://instagram.com/realwaynedupree

▶️ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@WayneDupreeShow