NEED TO KNOW

  • DOJ deleted press releases on roughly 1,600 Jan. 6 defendants, calling them "partisan propaganda"
  • Seditious conspiracy convictions against Proud Boys and Oath Keepers vacated Thursday
  • Republican senators and a swing-district GOP House member are moving to block the $1.776B fund

WASHINGTON, DC (TDR) — The Justice Department confirmed Friday it removed most press releases documenting Jan. 6 prosecutions from its website, the latest in a coordinated effort to dismantle the government's record of the Capitol attack.

The big picture: The deletions are not standalone. They land inside a deliberate sequence — pardon, purge, pay — that the Trump administration has built over 16 months.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

Why it matters: The federal record of the largest criminal investigation in U.S. history is being actively unwound by the agency that compiled it.

Driving the news: DOJ's Rapid Response X account did not soft-pedal the deletions, framing the move as policy not housekeeping.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Following ongoing debates over border security and immigration policy in 2026, do you support stricter enforcement measures?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from The Dupree Report, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.
  • "Nothing 'quiet' about it… We are proud to reverse the DOJ's weaponization under the Biden administration"
  • The fund draws from the federal judgment fund, a perpetual appropriation typically used to settle lawsuits
  • It was created as part of settling Trump's $10 billion suit against the IRS, and also shields his businesses from IRS audits

What they're saying:

  • Acting AG Todd Blanche — "It's not limited to Republicans. It's not limited to the Biden weaponization. It's not limited in any way, scope or form to January 6th, or to Jack Smith"
  • Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa. — "Congress has a constitutional responsibility to protect taxpayer dollars and oversee federal spending"
  • Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y. — "This is a bipartisan bill to block the President's $1.7 billion slush fund to pay off January 6th criminals"

Yes, but: DOJ cites real precedent. The Obama administration's 2010 Keepseagle settlement used the same judgment-fund mechanism for a $760 million payout on discrimination claims.

  • The judgment fund is a legitimate, long-standing appropriation
  • An executive branch can clear its own website of material it considers political; courts have rarely intervened in such decisions
  • Blanche told senators the fund will be audited and report quarterly to the AG

Between the lines: The agency that built the case against Jan. 6 is now methodically erasing it: pardoning the defendants, vacating the convictions, deleting the records, and preparing to pay the participants.

  • Each move alone has a defensible technical rationale; together they reconstitute the record
  • The same DOJ that prosecuted seditious conspiracy now treats those prosecutions as the crime
  • A future administration cannot easily restore what an active prosecutorial record once documented

What's next:

  • Three federal lawsuits are already pending against the fund
  • The Fitzpatrick-Suozzi bill faces a GOP-controlled House where Senate Majority Leader John Thune has said he is "not a big fan"
  • Archived copies of the deleted releases remain available through nonprofit and academic mirrors

Where does an administration's authority to reframe its predecessor's record end — and the public's right to a stable factual archive begin?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from NBC News, The Associated Press, CBS News, ABC News, PBS NewsHour, Newsweek, and the Department of Justice

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10