NEED TO KNOW

  • Ben-Gvir publicly demanded Netanyahu phone Trump and "pound on the table" over Iran deal
  • Same press conference pushed Lebanon escalation while US-Iran talks proceed
  • Lindsey Graham simultaneously told Trump to "stick to your guns" on getting the deal done

JERUSALEM (TDR) — National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir told reporters at an Otzma Yehudit press conference Monday that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu must call President Donald Trump and "pound on the table" over the emerging US-Iran deal, while demanding Israel restart "intensive warfare" in Lebanon.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

MORE NEWS: Iran and US Leak Two Different Iran Deals to Their Own Audiences

The big picture: Ben-Gvir's dual demands amount to a junior coalition partner trying to constrain a US president's diplomacy from outside.

  • He told Netanyahu to inform Trump that Israel is "resuming the war in Lebanon"
  • Called for cutting Lebanon's electricity and seizing territory up to the Zahrani River
  • Said he trusted Netanyahu to "stand up for Israel's red lines"

Why it matters: Ben-Gvir's leverage comes from Otzma Yehudit's lynchpin position in Netanyahu's coalition.

  • His party has threatened to bring down the government over Iran or Lebanon concessions
  • The pressure narrows Netanyahu's room to accept a deal Trump signs
  • Trump and Netanyahu spoke Saturday; Trump reaffirmed Israel's right to defend itself

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Following ongoing debates over border security and immigration policy in 2026, do you support stricter enforcement measures?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from The Dupree Report, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Driving the news: The press conference came as Washington and Tehran moved closer to terms, with significant gaps still on enrichment and verification.

  • Trump May 20 publicly mused at the Coast Guard Academy about whether to "finish the job" or accept a signed document
  • Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich called for striking 10 buildings in Beirut for every Hezbollah drone
  • Opposition leader Yair Lapid called the emerging deal "a disaster" on verification grounds

What they're saying:

  • Itamar Ben-Gvir, National Security Minister — "We must not normalize the reality of explosive drones. The time has come for the prime minister to bang on Trump's desk and inform him that we are resuming the war in Lebanon."
  • Lindsey Graham, R-SC, on X Sunday — "Stick to your guns in getting a good deal with Iran. Equally important, stick to your guns in insisting Saudi Arabia and others join the Abraham Accords as part of these negotiations."
Close

MORE NEWS: NRSC Scrubs Its Own Paxton Attacks as Both Parties Cheer the Matchup

Yes, but: The substantive Iran-deal concerns Ben-Gvir cites are not invented.

  • The 2015 JCPOA's sunset clauses and enrichment thresholds drew bipartisan US criticism
  • Even Lapid, from the center-left opposition, called the current deal a disaster
  • The genuine question is whether Ben-Gvir's leverage shapes a sound red-line strategy or substitutes an Otzma Yehudit agenda for one

Between the lines: Both tribes are running incomplete stories. The pro-Israel hawkish frame treats Ben-Gvir as a national-security voice defending against a weak deal, ignoring that France banned him last week, Poland imposed a five-year ban over the Gaza flotilla video, 11 countries summoned Israeli ambassadors, and his role is a liability his own allies are managing. The anti-Netanyahu dovish frame treats him as a saboteur of peace, ignoring that legitimate Iran-deal questions exist independent of who raises them, and Graham is making the opposite case from inside the US right. What no one says plainly: a foreign minister with coalition leverage but no formal standing on US foreign policy is publicly trying to set red lines for a US president, while that president's own party splits on whether to push back or thank him.

What's next:

  • Trump-Netanyahu follow-up call expected before any deal signing
  • Israeli cabinet vote on Lebanon escalation pending; Otzma Yehudit's coalition position is the swing
  • US-Iran terms unsettled on Hormuz access and ballistic-missile scope

If a foreign coalition partner can publicly try to set red lines on a US president's diplomacy, does the deal Trump signs reflect American interests, Israeli interests, or whichever coalition squeezes him harder?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from The Jerusalem Post, The Times of Israel, CBS News, The New Arab, South China Morning Post, Times of Israel May 25 liveblog, Times of Israel May 20 liveblog, The Statesman, The Washington Post, and The Washington Times.

 

 

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10