NEED TO KNOW

  • Nithya Raman has pulled ahead of Spencer Pratt by under a point for the LA mayoral runoff's second slot.
  • The lead materialized only as late mail ballots were counted, days after election night.
  • California's count is legitimate and routine — and its own governor says the delay breeds suspicion.

LOS ANGELES, CA (TDR) — City Councilmember Nithya Raman has overtaken former reality-TV star Spencer Pratt for second place in the Los Angeles mayoral primary, reversing his election-night lead as late ballots are counted.

The big picture: Mayor Karen Bass already advanced to the November runoff. The remaining fight is for the second slot opposite her, and it flipped only after days of tabulation. Pratt led on election night; by the weekend, Raman had pulled ahead. Nothing irregular happened. That is precisely what makes the moment combustible.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

Why it matters: A reversal driven entirely by legitimate late ballots is the exact pattern that primes voters to suspect the result, regardless of party.

Driving the news: The shift played out as a national fight over the pace of the count.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Following ongoing debates over border security and immigration policy in 2026, do you support stricter enforcement measures?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from The Dupree Report, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.
  • President Trump said his DOJ was investigating the delay, posting "Why the vote counting DELAY???"
  • Pratt, watching his lead shrink, posted a meme of a man straining to make sense of the count.

What they're saying: Election experts and the state's own leadership frame the slowness as both lawful and a liability.

Yes, but: Both halves of the distrust fight are standing on something real, and neither will say so.

  • The count is legitimate. Late-counted ballots are not fraud, and a lead that grows as they are tallied is a documented pattern, not a heist.
  • Yet a system that takes weeks and routinely reverses election-night leads is, by its own governor's admission, an opacity problem the state has chosen and underfunded — handing bad-faith actors a real grievance to exploit.

Between the lines: The uncomfortable truth neither side states is that "legitimate" and "trust-eroding" are not opposites here. A process can be entirely lawful and still be designed in a way that manufactures suspicion every cycle. The fraud claims are unsupported — but the impulse behind them is fed by a genuine feature of California's system, not invented from nothing. Defending the count's integrity and defending its current design are two different arguments, and conflating them is how both tribes talk past each other.

What's next:

  • Watch whether Raman's lead holds or widens as remaining ballots are processed toward the July 3 deadline.
  • Track whether the DOJ delay probe produces anything beyond the posted complaint.
  • Monitor legislative proposals to fund faster counting ahead of November.

If a vote count is both completely legitimate and predictably breeds distrust every cycle, whose job is it to fix the part that isn't the fraud?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from ABC News, KTLA, NBC Los Angeles, CBS News, Variety, PBS NewsHour, CNN, and CalMatters.


Slug:

SEO Title:

Focus Keyphrase:

Description:

Tags:

Social Media Post (X):

Social Media Post (Facebook):

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10