• Professional golfer Phil Mickelson sparked controversy by criticizing Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for opposing the SAVE Act, a Republican-backed bill requiring proof of citizenship for federal voter registration.
  • The SAVE Act, passed in the House, aims to tighten voter registration rules to protect election integrity, but Democrats argue it could disenfranchise eligible voters and undermine democracy.
  • The bill now faces an uphill battle in the Senate, where it requires bipartisan support to advance, with Schumer vowing it will not pass.

Professional golfer Phil Mickelson sparked controversy on social media after criticizing Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., for opposing the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. The Republican-backed legislation, which passed the House earlier this month, would require proof of citizenship for federal voter registration and remove noncitizens from voter rolls.

Mickelson’s comment came after Schumer denounced the SAVE Act during a Senate address, labeling it “the antithesis of democracy.” A video clip of Schumer’s speech shared on X (formerly Twitter) described the bill as “dangerous” and “reminiscent of Jim Crow.” Mickelson responded by calling Schumer a “traitor” and criticized his stance on extending voting rights to noncitizens.

What Is the SAVE Act?

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

MORE NEWS: Clinton Epstein Depositions Expose Bipartisan Accountability Gap

The SAVE Act, passed in the House by a 220-208 vote, aims to tighten voter registration rules by mandating individuals provide proof of citizenship in person before registering for federal elections. According to supporters, including Republican lawmakers, the bill seeks to protect the integrity of American elections and prevent unlawful participation.

However, Democrats strongly oppose the measure, arguing it could disenfranchise eligible voters and undermine democratic principles. Schumer has vowed the SAVE Act will not pass in the Senate, where it needs 60 votes to advance. “Every single Democrat is united against it. The SAVE Act is dead on arrival,” Schumer declared on Wednesday.

Mickelson Doubles Down

Facing criticism online, Mickelson stood by his remarks, questioning how allowing noncitizens to vote serves American interests. “How is this fighting for Americans? It is NOT,” Mickelson wrote, doubling down on his stance against Schumer.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Do you think there is more to the story about the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie that we're not being told?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from The Dupree Report, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

What’s Next?

The fate of the SAVE Act now lies in the Senate, where it faces an uphill battle. Without bipartisan support, the bill is unlikely to move forward. This debate underscores the broader discussion around election integrity, citizenship requirements, and the role of legislation in shaping democracy.

Tell us your thoughts: Does the SAVE Act protect democracy or hinder it? Share your views below and Follow The Dupree Report on WhatsApp for updates.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10