• A federal judge dismissed a trespassing charge against Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, criticizing the DOJ for rushing and retracting the case, calling it a “worrisome misstep.”
• Rep. LaMonica McIver now faces charges of assaulting law enforcement during the same incident at a U.S. ICE facility, adding to the controversy.
• The case raises broader concerns about DOJ priorities, political motivations, and government accountability in high-profile cases.

A federal judge delivered a scathing rebuke to the Department of Justice (DOJ) on Wednesday, dismissing a trespassing charge against Newark Mayor Ras Baraka (D) related to his visit earlier this month to a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility. The incident, which involved Baraka and three Democratic members of Congress, sparked intense scrutiny of the government’s actions.

Judge Calls Out DOJ Overreach

U.S. District Judge Andre Espinosa called the DOJ’s actions a “worrisome misstep,” criticizing the New Jersey U.S. Attorney’s Office for rushing the case and later retracting the charge, which he labeled “embarrassing.” Espinosa dismissed the complaint with prejudice, barring the government from ever refiling it.

“Your role is not to secure convictions at all costs, nor to satisfy public clamor, nor to advance political agendas,” Espinosa told the government’s lawyer. “Your allegiance is to the impartial application of the law.”

Political Fallout and Further Charges

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

While Mayor Baraka walked free, the case drew additional controversy as Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.), who accompanied Baraka to the ICE facility, now faces charges of assaulting law enforcement. The DOJ alleges McIver “slammed her forearms” into immigration officers during the altercation. She appeared in court Wednesday and has not yet commented on the charges.

Interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba announced last week that the trespassing charge against Baraka would be dropped, but the decision was overshadowed by McIver’s alleged actions. The situation further fuels debates over immigration enforcement and Democratic opposition to ICE operations.

Broader Implications of DOJ Missteps

The DOJ’s handling of this case raises serious questions about priorities and political motivations. Republican critics have long argued that the agency’s actions often align with partisan goals. Judge Espinosa’s rebuke suggests the government may have overstepped in pursuing charges against Baraka, creating unnecessary legal and reputational consequences.

Mayor Baraka’s legal team insisted the charges were baseless, with his lawyer stating, “We felt confident that Mayor Baraka would be vindicated.” Baraka, for his part, offered little comment beyond agreeing with his attorneys.

What’s Next?

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

The case underscores ongoing concerns about government accountability, especially in high-profile cases involving immigration. It’s unclear how the DOJ will address its misstep or handle McIver’s charges moving forward. Republicans may use this incident to further highlight what they see as the DOJ’s failure to focus on real issues, such as tackling illegal immigration.

What do you think of this case? Share your thoughts below and join the conversation.

Follow The Dupree Report On WhatsApp.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10