• Two undocumented migrants have been arrested after an off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer was shot during an alleged robbery in Manhattan. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and federal officials accuse sanctuary policies of enabling the incident. Authorities say the suspects have criminal histories and were previously detained but released, prompting renewed debate on public safety and immigration enforcement.

NEW YORK, NY (TDR) — In a dramatic weekend incident, two undocumented migrants have been arrested in connection with the shooting of an off-duty Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer during an apparent robbery in Manhattan’s Riverside Park. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem placed blame squarely on sanctuary city policies, suggesting these contributed to the suspects remaining free on New York’s streets.

Factual Account of Events

The shooting occurred Saturday night near the Hudson River. A witness told authorities the off-duty CBP officer and his companion were seated on rocks by the water when a scooter carrying two individuals pulled up. One passenger allegedly brandished a firearm and demanded their belongings. The CBP officer drew his weapon in self-defense, and an exchange of fire ensued.

“The CBP officer was shot in his right arm and left cheek,” law enforcement sources said, but noted he was in stable condition following prompt medical care.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

Following the incident, New York City police and federal agents identified one suspect as Miguel Francisco Mora Nunez, a Dominican national previously stopped by Border Patrol in Arizona in April 2023. Nunez sustained injuries and was taken to a Bronx hospital under custody. Shortly afterward, authorities apprehended a second suspect, Christhian Aybar-Berroa, described by Noem as “an illegal immigrant from the Dominican Republic” with an outstanding deportation order from 2023.

Sanctuary Policies Under Fire

During a Monday hospital visit, Noem held firm on her position, linking sanctuary policies to the suspects’ history of arrests and release.

“He was arrested four different times in New York City… and because of the mayor’s policies and sanctuary city policies, was released back to do harm,” Noem told reporters.

Officials claimed Aybar-Berroa had been detained on charges including reckless endangerment and larceny—yet released before ICE could act. She stated he “entered the country illegally in 2022 under the Biden Administration and was ordered for final removal in 2023 by an immigration judge.”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott echoed Noem’s concern:

“We should not be here today. The reason these two assailants are inside the United States… is because of failed border policies.”

Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons added that sanctuary policies and “open border” enforcement lapses had allowed dangerous individuals to commit further crimes.

Political Fallout and Official Responses

New York Mayor Eric Adams countered Noem’s critique, underscoring the judiciary’s role in pretrial release decisions.

“We arrest people; the courts determine if they’ll stay in jail. This person has been part of a revolving-door system,” Mayor Adams said. “Stop the revolving-door system, go after dangerous migrants… allow hardworking people… to live safely.”

Additionally, White House border adviser Tom Homan called sanctuary cities “sanctuaries for criminals,” and expressed hope that allegations around migrant protections and public safety would spur policy changes.

Broader Context and National Debate

This case mirrors political battlegrounds across the nation. As President Trump commented, “an incredible CBP Officer was shot in the face by an Illegal Alien Monster freed… under Joe Biden.” His remarks evoked both outrage and support among his base, illustrating the sharp divide over immigration and public safety.

Legal observers note that sanctuary policies are designed to foster trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement—not absolve offenders, but to prevent victims and witnesses from avoiding police. Yet critics argue real-world outcomes—like the Riverside Park shooting—reveal policy flaws.

Legal and Practical Implications

Authorities are evaluating charges against Nunez and Aybar-Berroa, potentially including attempted murder and armed robbery. If convicted, both could face federal and state prison terms.

The federal government is also under pressure to reassess the efficacy of detainer requests made to sanctuary jurisdictions. Such cases may lead to stronger policies or targeted legislation to bridge enforcement gaps.

A Community Reckoning

The incident in Riverside Park may serve as a flashpoint in the ongoing debate between liberty and security, between limited government and public protection. Sanctuary advocates emphasize due process and community safety; meanwhile, proponents of stricter enforcement stress tangible risks to public security.

As legal proceedings unfold, policymakers and citizens alike must ask: how do we defend constitutional protections while ensuring community safety and fairness for all?

Follow The Dupree Report on YouTube

Meta Description:

Slug:

Keywords:

Article Related Key Phrase:

Kicker Label:

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10