• Danielle Christine Miller convicted of filling out deceased mother’s mail-in ballot for Trump in 2024 presidential election
• Miller receives three years supervised probation, $885 fine and must complete educational requirements about voting’s role in democracy
• County attorney says case demonstrates election system’s effectiveness at detecting and preventing fraudulent ballot submissions

NASHWAUK, Minn. (TDR) — A Minnesota woman convicted of filling out and submitting a mail-in ballot for her deceased mother in support of Republican Donald Trump during the 2024 presidential election was ordered by a judge to write an essay and read a book about voting’s importance to democracy. The case has drawn attention as evidence of how election safeguards detect fraud, according to prosecutors.

Trump, who won a second term last year, has railed against mail-in voting as fraudulent and falsely claimed it as one reason he lost the 2020 election to Democrat Joe Biden. Itasca County Attorney Jake Fauchald said the Minnesota case shows how well the election system works and catches attempted voter fraud.

Election officials flagged suspicious ballots

Danielle Christine Miller, 51, of Nashwauk, in a rural area about three hours north of Minneapolis, was charged last fall with three felonies after local election officials notified authorities in October about two absentee ballots that had been flagged for fraud. One of those was from a registered voter who had died, Miller’s mother.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

According to court papers, Miller told an investigator that she had filled out her mother’s absentee ballot and signed her mother’s name on its signature envelope. She said her mother was an avid Trump supporter and wanted to vote for him, but she died in August 2024 before receiving an absentee ballot, according to the complaint. Miller also said she signed her mother’s signature as a witness on her own ballot, the document said.

Defendant claimed intoxication during offense

Miller pleaded guilty last week to intentionally making or signing a false certificate. As part her plea, she claimed she was intoxicated when submitting the mail ballots and was unable to precisely remember what she did, but agreed that the evidence could find her guilty, Fauchald said. A message left for Miller’s attorney was not immediately returned.

Minnesota Ninth Judicial District Judge Heidi Chandler on Wednesday dismissed the other two charges. Miller’s sentence includes up to three years of supervised probation and an $885 fine.

Unorthodox educational requirements imposed

The judge also imposed some unorthodox conditions. Miller must read a book about the history of voting in America and current related issues, Thank You for Voting: The Maddening, Enlightening, Inspiring Truth About Voting in America. She must also write an essay about what she learned from the book and her experience with the criminal justice system.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

The educational requirements represent an unusual approach to sentencing in voter fraud cases, which typically result in fines, probation or incarceration. Chandler’s decision appears aimed at addressing what prosecutors characterized as a misunderstanding about election procedures rather than purely punitive measures.

The case emerged when election officials conducted routine verification of absentee ballots and identified inconsistencies that triggered an investigation. The swift detection and prosecution demonstrates the multiple layers of security built into mail-in voting systems, Fauchald noted.

Minnesota election officials use signature verification, cross-checking with death records, and other safeguards to prevent fraudulent votes from being counted. When suspicious ballots are identified, they are flagged for investigation before being processed.

The conviction comes as Trump continues to promote unsubstantiated claims about widespread mail-in voter fraud, despite numerous audits and investigations finding such incidents remain extremely rare. Election security experts note that while individual cases of fraud do occur, systemic safeguards effectively prevent them from affecting election outcomes.

Do educational sentencing requirements effectively address voter fraud violations?

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10