• Tom Homan warns that escalating political rhetoric around ICE is creating real safety risks for federal agents.
• The border czar says demonizing frontline officers blurs the line between policy debate and personal targeting.
• Homan urges Democratic leaders to lower the temperature before words translate into irreversible consequences.

WASHINGTON (TDR) — Tom Homan delivered a rare, emotional plea this week aimed squarely at Democratic officials and allied activists: turn down the temperature before someone gets killed. In remarks that spread rapidly online, Homan said political language that paints immigration officers as villains is helping create a climate where threats feel justified and violence feels inevitable.

The line that cut through the noise was not policy-heavy or procedural. It was personal. “I don’t wanna bury anybody else”, Homan said, describing the cumulative weight of decades around enforcement work, danger, and the reality that uniformed officers don’t get to debate politics on social media — they just show up and do the job.

NOW – Border Czar Tom Homan: “I’m begging the politicians, the governors, the mayors who constantly attack these men and women, please stop… the men and women of ICE and Border Patrol are patriots. Hard stop.” pic.twitter.com/pQD2BAxIMU

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) December 13, 2025

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

A warning aimed at the political class

Homan’s comments came during a press conference in San Diego, where he argued that criticism of enforcement policy has increasingly blurred into broad condemnation of the people tasked with carrying it out. In his view, that shift matters. Disagreement over laws is part of democratic life; turning frontline officers into symbols to be hated is something else entirely.

Homan framed his message around the daily exposure of ICE and Border Patrol agents — and the way public rhetoric can translate into real-world targeting. He contended that when leaders treat enforcement work as inherently immoral, the country shouldn’t be surprised when a fringe actor decides “moral” people should stop it by force.

His plea lands in a moment when immigration enforcement has re-entered the political foreground, with the administration defending tougher tactics while critics accuse it of overreach. Homan’s point was narrower than the broader immigration fight: whatever the policy, he says, demonizing officers increases danger.

The flashpoints feeding the fear

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Homan has repeatedly pushed back on what he calls inflammatory analogies, including comparisons of ICE to Nazis — a rhetorical move he says doesn’t just mischaracterize the agency, but primes the public to view agents as enemies rather than civil servants.

That argument has intensified following specific incidents cited in coverage of his recent warnings, including an officer shot near a detention facility that became a rallying point for those insisting the political temperature is becoming operationally dangerous. Homan has leaned into the message that these are not abstract risks and that “normal” enforcement can quickly become a flashpoint in a hyper-charged environment.

He has also pointed to broader concerns about attacks on ICE officers and escalating hostility at protests, arguing that officers now face threats not only in the field but in their private lives. In prior public testimony, the issue of violence and threats around facilities and officers has also surfaced, including discussion in the public record about security concerns tied to attacks on federal sites. Shots fired at an ICE facility has been cited in older testimony as an example of how quickly rhetoric and unrest can turn deadly.

Political stakes beyond the soundbites

The broader political moment matters here, too. Homan has recently defended hardline enforcement approaches in other contexts, including the administration’s approach to Minnesota’s Somali community. Immigration crackdown on Somalis in Minnesota has drawn national attention and fierce criticism from local and national Democrats, reinforcing how quickly immigration enforcement becomes a proxy war for broader cultural conflict.

Meanwhile, the political debate is also being covered as an extension of Trump-era enforcement instincts, with new disputes over tone, transparency, and community trust. Homan’s defense of Trump after controversial remarks illustrates how quickly these controversies spill from policy into political identity.

Homan’s message ultimately asks leaders to separate their policy fight from personal demonization. The warning isn’t subtle: if language keeps escalating, the risk of tragedy grows — and the next headline may not be about rhetoric at all.

When political language escalates beyond policy disagreement, who bears responsibility if rhetoric turns into real-world violence?

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10