NEED TO KNOW

  • Judge Richard Leon allows underground bunker work at the ballroom site
  • Above-ground ballroom construction still blocked without Congressional approval
  • Trump called Leon "Trump Hating" and vowed no judge would stop the project

WASHINGTON (TDR) — U.S. District Judge Richard Leon issued a revised order Thursday letting Donald Trump proceed with underground bunker construction at the White House ballroom site while keeping the 90,000-square-foot addition frozen without Congressional sign-off.

The big picture: The ruling carves the project in two — letting security work advance while refusing to let "national security" swallow the entire injunction.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

MORE NEWS: Vance’s Vague Accusation Has a Very Specific Paper Trail

  • Leon was responding to a D.C. Circuit order to clarify his prior ruling
  • The appeals panel split 2-1, with Trump appointee Neomi Rao dissenting

Why it matters: The ruling narrows what a president can build on the White House grounds by invoking security, and limits how far below-ground approvals can stretch above-ground scope.

  • Underground work includes bunkers, medical facilities, and secure communications
  • Above-ground construction would add 90,000 square feet fit for 999 guests

Driving the news: Leon rejected the administration's argument that the entire ballroom qualifies for a safety-and-security exemption, and Trump responded within hours.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Following recent reports that Congress is considering a nationwide voter ID requirement for federal elections, do you support requiring voters to show identification before casting a ballot?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from The Dupree Report, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.
  • Richard Leon — "National security is not a blank check to proceed with otherwise unlawful activity."
  • Leon noted the ballroom's timeline runs to 2028, undercutting urgency claims
  • The D.C. Circuit asked Leon last week to clarify how the injunction intersects with safety
  • Leon stayed his new ruling for one week, giving DOJ time for Supreme Court review

What they're saying: Both sides treated the order as a win worth fighting over.

  • Carol Quillen, National Trust for Historic Preservation CEO — "We are pleased the court upheld the preliminary injunction and halted above-ground construction of the White House ballroom until Congress approves the project."
  • National Trust lawyers wrote that "the lack of a massive ballroom on the White House grounds is not a national-security emergency"
  • Trump on Truth Social — "No Judge can be allowed to stop this Historic and Militarily Imperative Project."
  • Trump claimed the ballroom requires "Drone Proof Ceilings" and "Bullet, Ballistic, and Blast Proof Glass"

Yes, but: The administration's case is not baseless, and one judge at the appellate level agreed with it.

Close

MORE NEWS: CNBC’s “Worst States” List Sorted Perfectly by Party. So What?

  • Judge Neomi Rao, a Trump appointee, dissented citing a statute allowing presidents to improve the White House
  • DOJ argues the ballroom and its security features are "a single coherent whole"
  • The National Capital Planning Commission already approved the project on April 2
  • Trump says private donations cover the ballroom; taxpayer money covers the bunker

Between the lines: The security features both sides are fighting over — drone-proof roofs, blast glass, missile-resistant steel — are not scheduled for installation for months or years. That hole in the urgency argument is what neither party wants to say out loud.

  • Leon wrote the features are "still months, if not years, away from being realized"
  • Critics never explain why panels stacked with Trump loyalists still needed Congress
  • Supporters never explain why urgent security work is timed to a 2028 completion

What's next:

  • DOJ has one week to seek emergency Supreme Court review
  • Congress has not scheduled a vote on authorizing the ballroom
  • National Trust lawsuit continues in Leon's courtroom
  • Underground construction advances under the court's carve-out

When a president calls a building "militarily imperative" but its security features are years from installation, which matters more — the stated urgency, or the timeline?

Sources

This report was compiled using information from NBC News, The Washington Post via Daily Record, The Washington Times, and reporting by CNBC.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10