NEED TO KNOW

• Trump's lawyers filed Friday to pause the case 90 days for settlement talks
• The suit stems from the 2018–2020 leak of his tax records by a contractor
• Any payout would come from taxpayer funds, paid to a sitting president

WASHINGTON (TDR) — Lawyers for President Donald Trump asked a federal judge Friday to pause his $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service for 90 days while the sitting president negotiates a settlement with the agency he now commands.

Trump’s lawyers are in talks with the IRS to settle a $10B lawsuit over leaked tax returns from his first term. A court filing asks for a 90-day pause as both sides push to avoid trial. The case stems from a former IRS contractor who was jailed for leaking the data.#Trump #IRS pic.twitter.com/CtKBSaK0DM

— LaGist TV (@LagistTv) April 18, 2026

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

The big picture: A president suing his own government — and then negotiating with officials he appointed — has no clean precedent in modern American law.

• Trump filed the suit in Florida federal court earlier this year
• His sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump are also plaintiffs

Why it matters: Any settlement would flow from the U.S. Treasury to the commander-in-chief.

• Justice Department lawyers defending the IRS report up through Trump-appointed leadership
• A payout — even one donated to charity — would still originate with taxpayers
• The structure raises questions about conflicts of interest no prior administration has faced

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Driving the news: The filing was joint, but the request came from Trump's team, not the government.

• Both sides told the court the pause would "avoid protracted litigation"
• A Justice Department response had been due Monday
• The suit stems from former IRS contractor Charles Littlejohn, sentenced to five years in 2024 for leaking tax data on Trump, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk and thousands of others

What they're saying: The case has drawn sharp reactions across the spectrum — supporters citing real harm, critics citing self-dealing.

• Trump, on potential proceeds — "I think what we'll do is do something for charity. We could make it a substantial amount."
• Trump's lawsuit filing alleged "reputational and financial harm" from the leak
• Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. — The bill "will close the loopholes that enable this apparent corruption."
• Warren introduced legislation this week to bar presidents and vice presidents from collecting settlements from the federal government

Yes, but: Trump has a legitimate underlying grievance — the leak was a real federal crime, and Littlejohn is serving real prison time.

• Other victims of the same leak, including Bezos and Musk, have available civil remedies
• The IRS itself called Littlejohn's actions "unacceptable" in 2024
• A private citizen filing this suit would face no ethics questions at all

Between the lines: The settlement mechanics are the story most coverage is burying.

• Trump-appointed DOJ officials will decide whether — and how much — to pay the president who appointed them
• The 90-day pause buys time away from a public Justice Department filing that would have laid out the government's defense
• No comparable case exists in which a sitting president negotiated a personal payout from his own executive branch

What's next:

• The court will rule on the 90-day pause request
• Warren's settlement-ban bill faces a steep path in a Republican-held Congress
• Ethics watchdogs are expected to file complaints if a payout is approved

If a private citizen can sue the government and win a settlement, why should a sitting president be barred — and if he shouldn't, who enforces the line?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting by NBC News, The Washington Times, Mediaite, NBC Washington, and ClickOrlando.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10