NEED TO KNOW

  • Trump would drop his $10B IRS suit for a $1.7B taxpayer-funded compensation pool.
  • Money draws from the Judgment Fund, requiring no congressional vote.
  • Federal judge questioned whether Trump can sue agencies he controls.

RANDALLSTOWN, MD (TDR) — President Donald Trump may settle his $10 billion suit against the Internal Revenue Service for a $1.7 billion fund his administration controls.

The big picture: The structure routes Treasury money to people Trump's commission decides were victims of Biden-era "weaponization," potentially including Jan. 6 defendants and entities tied to Trump.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

  • ABC News first reported the proposed terms.
  • The commission has "total authority" to issue payouts; Trump can remove members without cause.
  • Money draws from Treasury's Judgment Fund, which Congress does not vote on per payout.

Why it matters: A sitting president would settle with agencies he commands and direct proceeds to a fund his appointees control.

Driving the news: Settlement talks accelerated ahead of the court deadline, with Democrats calling it a "slush fund" and some administration officials raising ethical concerns.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Following ongoing debates over border security and immigration policy in 2026, do you support stricter enforcement measures?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from The Dupree Report, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

What they're saying:

Yes, but: The leak Trump sued over was real. Littlejohn pleaded guilty in 2023 and was sentenced to 5 years for disclosing thousands of returns including Trump's. The IRS's failure to stop him was a documented breach. But the remedy now on offer converts that civil claim into a discretionary fund Trump's administration controls, a structure he himself called "strange" before pursuing it.

Between the lines: The Judgment Fund is the real story under the story. Congress built it in 1956 as a permanent appropriation to pay valid judgments without coming back for approval each time, a convenience mechanism rather than an oversight one. The design works when both sides of a case are genuinely adverse. It breaks when a president sues agencies he controls and his DOJ negotiates the settlement. The vulnerability predates Trump, but no prior administration has tested how far the fund can be pushed. Whether this settlement holds sets the precedent for the next president whose coalition has grievances worth settling.

What's next:

If presidents can use the Judgment Fund to pay people their administrations decide were wronged, what stops the next president from doing the same?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from ABC News, CNBC, TIME, Fortune, The New Republic, MS NOW, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, the Department of Justice, and the Treasury Department.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10