NEED TO KNOW
- Treasury General Counsel Brian Morrissey resigned Monday, seven months after Senate confirmation.
- DOJ announced a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" tied to Trump's withdrawn $10 billion IRS lawsuit.
- 93 House Democrats filed an amicus brief; judge closed the case without scrutiny.
RANDALLSTOWN, MD (TDR) — The Treasury Department's top lawyer resigned Monday hours after the Justice Department announced a $1.776 billion fund to compensate people who claim they were politically targeted, drawn from a settlement of President Trump's own lawsuit against the federal government.
The big picture: Brian Morrissey, confirmed in October 2025, stepped down the same day acting AG Todd Blanche unveiled the "Anti-Weaponization Fund." The money will come from the federal Judgment Fund, a permanent Treasury appropriation that requires no congressional vote.
Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10
- Morrissey is a former Sidley Austin partner and clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas
- He thanked Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in his resignation letter
- Treasury said he "served with both honor and integrity"
Why it matters: A sitting president has never before sought and received a monetary settlement from the government he leads, House Democrats argued in a filing in the Southern District of Florida.
- Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization receive a formal apology, but no direct payment
- Trump also dropped two civil claims totaling $230 million tied to the Russia probe and the Mar-a-Lago search
- Judge Kathleen Williams closed the case, saying she was "stripped of jurisdiction"
Driving the news: Blanche, Trump's former personal defense attorney, will appoint four of five commission members, with one selected in consultation with congressional leadership. Trump can remove any member without cause.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT
- Claims processing ends Dec. 15, 2028; unused funds revert to government
- DOJ cited the Obama-era Keepseagle v. Vilsack $760 million Native American farmer settlement as precedent
- DOJ said there will be "no partisan requirements" for eligibility
What they're saying:
- Todd Blanche, acting Attorney General — "The machinery of government should never be weaponized against any American."
- Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., House Judiciary ranking member — "No president can concoct a fake case for $10 billion in damages against the government so he can be plaintiff and defendant and then 'settle' his bogus case against himself."
- Retired Judge William Smith, George W. Bush appointee — "It's a fairly thinly veiled attempt to funnel federal money to people that are sympathetic to the president's cause."
Yes, but: The Keepseagle precedent DOJ cited differs in two key ways. That settlement compensated farmers in a class action against the USDA, with eligibility determined through litigation. This fund creates a commission appointed almost entirely by an attorney general who was the plaintiff's personal lawyer.
- Federal settlement authority requires "actual or imminent litigation", which Democrats argue a voluntarily dismissed suit is not
- DOJ insists eligibility criteria will be non-partisan, but criteria have not been released
- The two-year statute of limitations on the underlying civil claims had arguably already run
Between the lines: Morrissey's silence is the story. A sitting general counsel does not usually quit seven months in without a public reason. That he thanked Trump and Bessent in writing while declining all comment indicates a legal calculation, not a political one. Whatever he saw was serious enough to leave, and serious enough not to say so.
What's next:
- House Democrats' amicus brief is now moot; further litigation needs new plaintiffs with standing
- Treasury has not named an acting general counsel
- Commission appointments and eligibility criteria expected in coming weeks
When the Department of Justice serves as both the plaintiff's friend and the defendant's gatekeeper, what is left of the adversarial process, and who is accountable when there isn't one?
Sources
This report was compiled using reporting from The New York Times, The Hill, TIME, NBC News, ABC News, CNN, Politico, and Reuters
Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.