NEED TO KNOW

  • DOJ deleted press releases on roughly 1,600 Jan. 6 defendants, calling them "partisan propaganda"
  • Seditious conspiracy convictions against Proud Boys and Oath Keepers vacated Thursday
  • Republican senators and a swing-district GOP House member are moving to block the $1.776B fund

WASHINGTON, DC (TDR) — The Justice Department confirmed Friday it removed most press releases documenting Jan. 6 prosecutions from its website, the latest in a coordinated effort to dismantle the government's record of the Capitol attack.

The big picture: The deletions are not standalone. They land inside a deliberate sequence — pardon, purge, pay — that the Trump administration has built over 16 months.

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

Why it matters: The federal record of the largest criminal investigation in U.S. history is being actively unwound by the agency that compiled it.

Driving the news: DOJ's Rapid Response X account did not soft-pedal the deletions, framing the move as policy not housekeeping.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Following recent reports that Congress is considering a nationwide voter ID requirement for federal elections, do you support requiring voters to show identification before casting a ballot?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from The Dupree Report, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.
  • "Nothing 'quiet' about it… We are proud to reverse the DOJ's weaponization under the Biden administration"
  • The fund draws from the federal judgment fund, a perpetual appropriation typically used to settle lawsuits
  • It was created as part of settling Trump's $10 billion suit against the IRS, and also shields his businesses from IRS audits

What they're saying:

  • Acting AG Todd Blanche — "It's not limited to Republicans. It's not limited to the Biden weaponization. It's not limited in any way, scope or form to January 6th, or to Jack Smith"
  • Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa. — "Congress has a constitutional responsibility to protect taxpayer dollars and oversee federal spending"
  • Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y. — "This is a bipartisan bill to block the President's $1.7 billion slush fund to pay off January 6th criminals"

Yes, but: DOJ cites real precedent. The Obama administration's 2010 Keepseagle settlement used the same judgment-fund mechanism for a $760 million payout on discrimination claims.

  • The judgment fund is a legitimate, long-standing appropriation
  • An executive branch can clear its own website of material it considers political; courts have rarely intervened in such decisions
  • Blanche told senators the fund will be audited and report quarterly to the AG

Between the lines: The agency that built the case against Jan. 6 is now methodically erasing it: pardoning the defendants, vacating the convictions, deleting the records, and preparing to pay the participants.

  • Each move alone has a defensible technical rationale; together they reconstitute the record
  • The same DOJ that prosecuted seditious conspiracy now treats those prosecutions as the crime
  • A future administration cannot easily restore what an active prosecutorial record once documented

What's next:

  • Three federal lawsuits are already pending against the fund
  • The Fitzpatrick-Suozzi bill faces a GOP-controlled House where Senate Majority Leader John Thune has said he is "not a big fan"
  • Archived copies of the deleted releases remain available through nonprofit and academic mirrors

Where does an administration's authority to reframe its predecessor's record end — and the public's right to a stable factual archive begin?

Sources

This report was compiled using reporting from NBC News, The Associated Press, CBS News, ABC News, PBS NewsHour, Newsweek, and the Department of Justice

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10