• Russia has pushed back against a U.S. media report claiming President Vladimir Putin urged Iran to accept a “zero enrichment” nuclear deal with Washington, calling the story politically motivated disinformation. The Kremlin insists diplomacy—not pressure—is the only path forward on Iran’s nuclear program amid heightened tensions in the Middle East.

MOSCOW (TDR) — Russian officials on Sunday rejected claims that President Vladimir Putin privately urged Iran to accept a nuclear agreement requiring it to abandon uranium enrichment, denouncing the report as a provocation aimed at fueling regional instability.

The allegation, first published by Axios, cited unnamed European and Israeli sources who said Putin made the proposal following the recent 12-day Israel-Iran conflict. The report claimed the Russian leader conveyed the message to both Tehran and President Trump, suggesting a deal could help de-escalate tensions.

Moscow responds: “Fake news”

In a sharply worded statement from its Foreign Ministry, the Kremlin blasted the Axios article as “yet another dirty, politicized campaign launched with the aim of escalating tensions around Iran’s nuclear program.”

“Western media has become a tool of the deep state,” the statement read, accusing outlets of spreading “provocative acts and fake news.”

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10

Russian officials singled out Axios, calling it a “toilet tank” for disinformation that advances the interests of Western power structures.

“These claims are baseless and aimed at derailing diplomatic efforts,” the ministry added, reaffirming Moscow’s stance that “Iran’s nuclear issue should be resolved exclusively by political and diplomatic means.”

Tehran also dismisses the report

Iranian state media echoed the Kremlin’s skepticism. The Tasnim news agency cited unnamed Iranian sources saying “no such messages” had been received from Putin regarding a zero-enrichment deal.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT

Do you think there is more to the story about the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie that we're not being told?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from The Dupree Report, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Tehran has consistently rejected U.S. demands for zero enrichment, arguing that it needs nuclear technology for its civilian energy program, not weapons development. Iranian officials maintain that they have “no intention to pursue a nuclear bomb.”

The Axios report suggested that Iran had declined the proposal, further signaling the deep divide between Washington’s policy demands and Tehran’s bottom line.

U.S. pressure and diplomatic deadlock

The Trump administration has made uranium enrichment a red line in talks with Iran, framing the issue as central to preventing nuclear weapons development. But that stance has left negotiations stalled since the collapse of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), from which the U.S. formally withdrew in 2018.

Analysts say the Axios leak—true or not—may reflect ongoing frustrations among Western officials over Russia’s balancing act between Iran and the West, particularly as Putin attempts to position himself as a mediator in Middle East affairs.

“The geopolitical dynamics in the region are shifting quickly,” said one European diplomat familiar with the talks. “But it’s hard to tell whether Russia is playing peacemaker or merely playing both sides.”

What’s next?

With Iran firm on its nuclear rights and Moscow determined to defend its role as a regional power broker, prospects for a breakthrough appear slim. Still, U.S. officials have expressed openness to backchannel diplomacy—even as official channels remain strained.

In an era of conflicting narratives, whose version of diplomacy will shape the future of nuclear negotiations in the Middle East? Let us know your thoughts.

Follow The Dupree Report on YouTube

Freedom-Loving Beachwear by Red Beach Nation - Save 10% With Code RVM10